Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181002205836.2323084-1-arnd@arndb.de> <123f7e1c-8f2b-5797-de16-650ec01d0b24@tronnes.org>
 <20181003161326.GD31561@phenom.ffwll.local>
In-Reply-To: <20181003161326.GD31561@phenom.ffwll.local>
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:51:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1gKxXEthLvUxSxOrt6+1qzZE9Jba+vH_qFepv3KXba9g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/imx: move 'legacyfb_depth' definition out of #ifdef
To:     noralf@tronnes.org, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
        Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>, tzimmermann@suse.de,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:13 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 05:49:32PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> >
> >
> > Den 02.10.2018 22.58, skrev Arnd Bergmann:
> > > The variable is now referenced unconditionally, but still
> > > declared in an #ifdef:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c: In function 'imx_drm_bind':
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c:264:6: error: 'legacyfb_depth' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'lockdep_depth'?
> > >
> > > Remove the #ifdef so it can always be accessed.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f53705fd9803 ("drm/imx: Use drm_fbdev_generic_setup()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > ---
> >
> > I've already applied the previous one you sent:
> > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=064b06bbf117f8b5e64a5143e970d5a1cf602fd6
> >
> > Not sure when it reaches linux-next now that we are past rc6.
>
> Only once we're past -rc1.

Can we revert f53705fd9803 in linux-next then to prevent the regression from
making it into 4.20?

       Arnd