Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp653907imm; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 00:46:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63nGz0c2hBidqSROye3Xm2ZIf1rlcOl6PPIEFvsoklh/HVZ/up2hg2t/HNK9RJUyU68qpD0 X-Received: by 2002:a62:d110:: with SMTP id z16-v6mr5571529pfg.229.1538639193162; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:46:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538639193; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Au+jTImvzwjEVN3LhUZv7M+2ZK6MKSJIMeRS6tfdXHNKJ4OBFsGcCzcCZ0BxtWTc9o kV5IKAMIRc0D9oL9tWf8QSK+VEXvo4Pz9Dwl7v/aobqbfsLgRWvBCst1cNwfb5hE/TTR oo35FQYeX3rrTeyJFYbRi2cQNHhoQZrBLmMV8UyHGPc/nRZkg/gPS2p+CeY7ZI+QRByh fR8h2hBlI86Gw4v8d5p9M2DqN2FNEk0CXWNuhCvSAcaBrAPb4nC4LpJqzRo57vbwE2qT bzps6/4eN8hLz85033hpZJeWqGYi8geHhAMHOgfPBZXLhuH+O93mOL/B3mgvtTCMWLzY I3Ug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=uekW6/qcKzmeKQILXUDbVp+dq8Atq1BuveV6JJvTc2M=; b=RjIZasv8dguivi7u0mXlu2CQWT/h6aUxqFFMJMDEDRslEZ2nNxBDAgOqHDPSFTN9fp Inc2CDhJqzj65madt/AydGYxPUf7OWrEzYkU2m16T/SdYozs86tNyYdpnUJPs0rApY8u sjydtCTaBFwuWRH8Fcv7MA0QnoRSPDQOyXtQhqTlGTL+auNz1x6x54pISExAkBr0FqdM CiSNOtOMhO0f4xq/Wdv0IOBG3fdIlQuYFrg3zsx8Af2TKZKFQyvq70vPjd/WAB9WuOID hqHlfkIHQ/TP9Mj2J442D49p5q3NmJYX6yiZij310FTG8eyE/5u94APXqbLXxKSUWxX5 ttRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w14-v6si4297335plp.183.2018.10.04.00.46.16; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:46:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727666AbeJDOhd (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:37:33 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38630 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727476AbeJDOhd (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:37:33 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B6CAE0B; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:45:35 +0200 From: Johannes Thumshirn To: Jan Kara Cc: Linus Walleij , Paolo Valente , aherrmann@suse.com, Jens Axboe , linux-block , linux-mmc , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Pavel Machek , Ulf Hansson , Richard Weinberger , Artem Bityutskiy , Adrian Hunter , mgorman@suse.com, Chunyan Zhang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name, Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: BFQ default for single queue devices Message-ID: <20181004074535.GB6682@linux-x5ow.site> References: <20181002124329.21248-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <05fdbe23-ec01-895f-e67e-abff85c1ece2@kernel.dk> <20181003132554.GC21043@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20181003132554.GC21043@quack2.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:25:54PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 03-10-18 08:53:37, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:29 AM Paolo Valente wrote: > > > > > So, I do understand your need for conservativeness, but, after so much > > > evidence on single-queue devices, and so many years! :), what's the > > > point in keeping Linux worse for virtually everybody, by default? > > > > I understand if we need to ease things in as well, I don't intend this > > change for the current merge window or anything, since v4.19 > > will notably have this patch: > > > > commit d5038a13eca72fb216c07eb717169092e92284f1 > > Author: Johannes Thumshirn > > Date: Wed Jul 4 10:53:56 2018 +0200 > > > > scsi: core: switch to scsi-mq by default > > > > It has been more than one year since we tried to change the default from > > legacy to multi queue in SCSI with commit c279bd9e406 ("scsi: default to > > scsi-mq"). But due to issues with suspend/resume and performance problems > > it had been reverted again with commit cbe7dfa26eee ("Revert "scsi: default > > to scsi-mq""). > > > > In the meantime there have been a substantial amount of performance > > improvements and suspend/resume got fixed as well, thus we can re-enable > > scsi-mq without a significant performance penalty. > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn > > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke > > Reviewed-by: Ming Lei > > Acked-by: John Garry > > Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen > > > > I guess that patch can be a bit scary by itself. But IIUC it all went > > fine this time! > > > > But hey, if that works, that means $SUBJECT patch will enable BFQ on all > > libata devices and any SCSI that is single queue as well, not just > > "obscure" stuff like MMC/SD and UBI, and that is > > indeed a massive crowd of legacy devices. But we're talking > > v4.21 here. > > > > Johannes, you might be interested in $SUBJECT patch. > > It'd be nice to hear what SUSE people have to add, since they > > are pretty proactive in this area. > > So we do have a udev rules in our distro which sets the IO scheduler based > on device parameters (rotational at least, with blk-mq we might start > considering number of queues as well, plus we have some exceptions like > virtio, loop, etc.). So the kernel default doesn't concern us too much as a > distro. > > I personally would consider bfq a safer default for single-queue devices > (loop probably needs exception) but I don't feel too strongly about it. [Full quote for context] What about resurrecting CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED for MQ as well and leave it default to mq-deadline but give bfq, kyber and none as a choice as well? The question is shall we only do it for single queue devices or for native MQ devices as well if we go down that road? I understand the embedded floks will want a different interface than udev, but from the non-embedded point of view I'm with Jens and Jan here, let udev do the job. Johannes -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850