Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
To:     Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Jakub_Ra=c4=8dek?= <jracek@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kkolakow@redhat.com" <kkolakow@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
References: <CAE4VaGC+FcE4cTUwzTLuCRd8rnd-=MhSZHfjKstiRTKcYq-39g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>
Message-ID: <47e91887-089b-ba71-5f13-5acca0c8c5ad@jonmasters.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:08:36 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAE4VaGC+FcE4cTUwzTLuCRd8rnd-=MhSZHfjKstiRTKcYq-39g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [SCHEDULER] Performance drop in 4.19 compared to 4.18 kernel
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 9/7/18 5:34 AM, Jirka Hladky wrote:

> We would also be more than happy to test the new patches for the
> performance - please let us know if you are interested.  We have a
> pool of 1 NUMA up to 8 NUMA boxes for that, both AMD and Intel,
> covering different CPU generations from Sandy Bridge till Skylake.

I've followed up internally on ensuring Arm is added to your mix. Can
get you suitable 1 and 2P systems for internal use.

Jon.