Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 01:32:33 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: John Blackwood <john.blackwood@ccur.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@muc.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c linux-2.6.0-test10
Message-ID: <20031125003232.GA19764@averell>
References: <3FC26F78.10303@ccur.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3FC26F78.10303@ccur.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 729
Lines: 19

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:52:08PM -0500, John Blackwood wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> In linux-2.6.0-test10, I believe that there are several lines of code
> in the x86_64 version of handle_signal() that will not ever be executed
> and can most likely be removed.
> 
> I also believe that there are several lines that should be added to the
> end of the do_signal() routine for handling the -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK
> case.

Thanks, John. Was a mismerge. I added the change to my tree.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/