Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp831067imm; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 12:32:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62IeA96B1ymmhMTZqGP0jYdZONhb86F/vAaDq+b1hl6VKTTfL1Q3fTJoh8P8L51aGvldXj0 X-Received: by 2002:a62:2e02:: with SMTP id u2-v6mr13819981pfu.134.1538767960542; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 12:32:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1538767960; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e8sK/qyojYy4DMDXMJUsIkARMCz2oUZaWvSvYje9/czL05pBm+QszOA62tBzoNy52+ WWPgpoCCe7vVURgHyUFzxcJ/+n4XnNiKGcehpirtGsDx2YvGxnvR5Ue8hCjJ9b3TZeA4 KWgnRBrSptg9JAqpcSH5Lft/DgVQxBaatNmvMKAb2RvAGDwZa2KKAr8ZZgiygpwgryhN WJGeLzlQIaD3klFCUfnBnvLYCDQOV0jnmAjU9OSaI0uRLcKvukpDydJCY/NBx/99Al/F xdsKm13pM/17pUaMxwLAu+a5BIFScpM1wAxjvUlHEKfHnZ6qkRkhOKBk/NJcT8IQA36D HNuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=L/GYhl/kz5iHVXm8PHCJgwrS/wpZ0J0pAjnqWU9dQtI=; b=BEXSwGiIMxICWvbR+sUwFf1tnHOXDLIilacinJGX7hOVqgzMmT2dH2sbrsyaD2kjcG PfAo4t4sDW/MPqW75xTO6E7OTyUPDsxsog2AjaWV6FfLVvmmeNuuiTgv4ayRhekYfU2u F8v/yTPCKflTUXjWr0IviSs7oZLuxKYsDdd4lfow1Ah8bTMn+Ygia3MvfoD/yqdYEksw xMht9xoupTcILK7+oGZQcr8wge8XjGNT85P2lLNxhCQWyINj1znBuu7HQxrboFtBwgYr v/URyx1KhNUkTVsZb74ClZdDMdnET4QRWwtlk652GYthtQEyAz3KzHxih162aNGTBiTA hIyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r21-v6si8883096pgl.257.2018.10.05.12.32.25; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 12:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728826AbeJFCcQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:32:16 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:58983 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728147AbeJFCcQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:32:16 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 706E320731; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 21:32:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from bbrezillon (91-160-177-164.subs.proxad.net [91.160.177.164]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31C2220701; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 21:32:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 21:32:03 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , Zhouyang Jia , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/10] mtd: maps: gpio-addr-flash: Add support for device-tree devices Message-ID: <20181005213203.247c369f@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: <20181004142942.11887-1-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> <20181004142942.11887-2-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> <20181005002125.12fd229f@bbrezillon> <20181005090811.6b7e9957@bbrezillon> <20181005103730.57d52e3c@bbrezillon> <20181005121235.7e64b64a@bbrezillon> <20181005141057.0f1b0a9b@bbrezillon> <20181005165234.468d2397@bbrezillon> <20181005182931.172b8f1c@bbrezillon> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:12:43 +0200 Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > > I think I know what might be the issue. on cfi_cmdset_002.c > cfi_amdstd_reset can be called in parrallel to cfi_amdstd_destroy. > > maybe we should call > unregister_reboot_notifier(&mtd->reboot_notifier); > before > cfi_amdstd_reset(mtd) > > need to try that on real hw with some strategical printfs :P. But that > will ahve to wait til Monday No problem, nothing urgent here. Have a nice weekend.