Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 19:10:50 -0700
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, pantin@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] rcu doc updates for whatisRCU and checklist
Message-ID: <20181006021050.GC204532@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <20181005231815.170433-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20181006001326.GL2674@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181006001326.GL2674@linux.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:13:26PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > 
> > Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU and
> > checklists. Hopefully you agree with them. I left several old _bh and _sched
> > API references as is, since I don't think its a good idea to remove them till
> > the APIs themselves are removed, however I did remove several of them as well
> > (like in the first patch in this series) since I feel its better to "encourage"
> > new users not to use the old API.
> > 
> > Also do you think it makes sense for us to write coccinelle patches to check if
> > folks use them on new patches? Btw, I am new to coccinelle but I'd love to give
> > it a try, it looks exciting. I remember you saying you wanted to do that, so
> > that's something else you could potentially offload to me as you see fit ;-)
> > 
> > Thank you very much!
> 
> Good catches, applied and pushed, thank you!
> 
> I updated the commit log and a couple of the patches a bit, so could
> you please double-check them?

Yes I checked and it looks good, thanks!

 - Joel