Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262176AbTKYQ6k (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:58:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262330AbTKYQ6k (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:58:40 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-bos.redhat.com ([66.187.230.200]:25178 "EHLO chimarrao.boston.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262176AbTKYQ6j (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:58:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:58:35 -0500 (EST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.2/2.4/2.6 VMs: do malloc() ever return NULL? In-Reply-To: <3FC358B5.3000501@softhome.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 676 Lines: 19 On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote: > 2.6: the same as 2.4 with oom killer (default conf). I have no test > system to check 2.6. w/o oom killer. # echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory Then try again. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/