Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861851.4088.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
In-Reply-To: <1538861851.4088.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Sun, 7 Oct 2018 21:51:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXVbda8cn8Yt=wA9ABQ9M=S-QM51NVMb6N_J3yBz3sTgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the
 enforcement paragraph pending community discussion
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc:     ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:37 PM James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct.  Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
> enforcement clauses to give the community time to consider and debate how this
> should be handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds