Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 20:29:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 20:29:15 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:54567 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 20:29:09 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 02:29:05 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Gareth Hughes Cc: Linus Torvalds , dledford@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SETFPXREGS fix Message-ID: <20001104022905.E32767@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20001103174105.C857@athlon.random> <3A034F28.5DB994F4@valinux.com> <20001104020709.D32767@athlon.random> <3A0362BD.D6068EDE@valinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3A0362BD.D6068EDE@valinux.com>; from gareth@valinux.com on Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:13:33PM +1100 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:13:33PM +1100, Gareth Hughes wrote: > Yes, we can certainly mask out the mxcsr value in both cases. I just ^^^ s/can/must/ > think this makes the code a lot simpler and cleaner as a result - three I agree about the three vs one copy issue. Anyways my first priority was that the the code was safe, and the previous one was completly safe too (ok, I admit I had to check out the asm generated before trusting it 8). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/