Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp4364384imm; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:06:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60cYuk+ZImHsRyOSxWS7iO66qZANqnWERZMBwFIQ3RkDQEpe4/Q2rJpEX6kuPdgu2JYFSVP X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d808:: with SMTP id a8-v6mr27507138plz.306.1539057984826; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:06:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539057984; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Sqp+ylvoSh757Ku9umRtB4nqhGwg1zawPtat8KQQPtnEr4yoL9CU8uOU/wpFQATE6O PMESP1pnOH5T30+Sz/KtN4y0KYCFXRqGrR4mOxeBw4lLUu+cv/tiUuXUUK9z3WWWPL1u 1tJdLT2Yy4rV9e5p3smukoWJp+SoSnp4VfZPgwmsGeKKkgxwKK6fTDM2LXNcUjA6goUT xKdjsg+MRyKH30d1cXMkbyUA83SBufF3nUURZJ38ECGpwLyrZnfcNf55FuwylUnG4m92 yNM3+VXdQAUICC9iy+X9ZhTD6N0+zDJSQyrJemaEIXnVxyhWVEHd1E/FTm+S/yAynK2Q go3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:date; bh=NX1ZfmNAVdZpUNzv/ZUlUXFTPED53M+gSqUqf9PT4ek=; b=RBxlH1DzDr1chcXLlS1sW4LoBB+DMzXmuaonw/OIRnQFAmcAebzvHa7ltshnMKd/VK f9DRCdGIACfrrVsO/5HtxJCL4upCWBKXrPRjIJS5A2nb3fNGbDFxF5mnZwr0hyL7kqPI Xzu3KezkZD31lfqXTIOatQH0ZNP87aiz7vgtMKWNzcTGhLOz4RUqRbomFdJuHr1C/VQV bVTRu6z4TJhapjzIMRfRenEJ1XK1kS/QM5A/61iRxny783agbzD7/3xPpZMjZL/2KyHh dTITrqjsKBVDpVWl3StYcwF9qH6GvwdP+0b1GwzQnunvT8guHlzLqOdLUUnOaxCIdlba ncAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i189-v6si21317210pfg.281.2018.10.08.21.06.09; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725965AbeJILUm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:20:42 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38040 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725808AbeJILUl (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:20:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w9943pON141741 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:05:46 -0400 Received: from e13.ny.us.ibm.com (e13.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.203]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2n0m0d1uqt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:05:46 -0400 Received: from localhost by e13.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:05:46 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.29) by e13.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.200) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:05:43 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w9945gLG26869902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 04:05:42 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE17B2065; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:03:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDEBB205F; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:03:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.85.183.61]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:03:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E7C016C2663; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:05:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:05:41 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: zhouzhouyi@gmail.com Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: Adjust the comment of function rcu_is_watching Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com References: <5bbafe54.1c69fb81.954a9.deae@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5bbafe54.1c69fb81.954a9.deae@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18100904-0064-0000-0000-0000035C73E5 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009845; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000267; SDB=6.01099963; UDB=6.00569068; IPR=6.00880011; MB=3.00023672; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-10-09 04:05:45 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18100904-0065-0000-0000-00003AEAC52C Message-Id: <20181009040541.GI2674@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-10-09_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=988 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1810090042 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:50:41AM +0000, zhouzhouyi@gmail.com wrote: > From: Zhouyi Zhou > > Because RCU avoids interrupting idle CPUs, rcu_is_watching is used to > test whether or not it is currently legal to run RCU read-side > critical sections on this CPU. > > First sentence and last sentence of current comment for rcu_is_watching > have opposite meaning of what is expected. > > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou Good eyes! Applied and pushed, thank you! Thanx, Paul > --- > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > index 0b760c1..adb04ea 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > @@ -1010,12 +1010,12 @@ void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void) > } > > /** > - * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is idle > + * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is not idle > * > * Return true if RCU is watching the running CPU, which means that this > * CPU can safely enter RCU read-side critical sections. In other words, > - * if the current CPU is in its idle loop and is neither in an interrupt > - * or NMI handler, return true. > + * if the current CPU is not in its idle loop or is in an interrupt or > + * NMI handler, return true. > */ > bool notrace rcu_is_watching(void) > { > -- > 2.1.4 >