Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:45:20 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>,
        "Zhu, Rex" <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values to DC for
 smu7/8
Message-ID: <20181009124520.GA1633@kroah.com>
References: <20180924113103.999624566@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20180924113125.488862921@linuxfoundation.org>
 <BN6PR12MB18092FFEF5BB3861912C8535F7E60@BN6PR12MB1809.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20181008144421.GB15968@kroah.com>
 <BN6PR12MB180971CA88D1B8D580512A71F7E60@BN6PR12MB1809.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20181008171115.GB29418@kroah.com>
 <BN6PR12MB1809AAC678E020F33E189C92F7E60@BN6PR12MB1809.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR12MB1809AAC678E020F33E189C92F7E60@BN6PR12MB1809.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:01:50PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 1:11 PM
> > To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; Wentland, Harry
> > <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>; Zhu, Rex <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>; Sasha Levin
> > <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values to DC
> > for smu7/8
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 04:02:19PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 10:44 AM
> > > > To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
> > > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; Wentland,
> > > > Harry <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>; Zhu, Rex <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>;
> > Sasha
> > > > Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values
> > > > to DC for smu7/8
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:33:56PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 7:53 AM
> > > > > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>;
> > > > > > stable@vger.kernel.org; Wentland, Harry
> > > > > > <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander
> > > > > > <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Zhu, Rex <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>;
> > Sasha
> > > > > > Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values
> > > > > > to DC for
> > > > > > smu7/8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please
> > > > > > let me
> > > > know.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This regresses power usage on 4.18.  Please revert.
> > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201275
> > > >
> > > > Is it reverted in "upstream" as well?  If not, please get the fix in
> > > > there and then I will be glad to backport it here.
> > > >
> > >
> > > There's no breakage in upstream.  This patch addressed breakages in
> > > 4.19 specifically due to some other refactoring we did in the driver.
> > > I'll try and dig out the exact series of patches this addressed.
> > 
> > So there is no problem in 4.19-rc7?  That contridicts the statement of looking
> > in drm-next for the fixes.
> 
> Sorry, what statement about drm-next?  This patch was for 4.19 and was not intended for 4.18.  It was picked up by Sasha's auto select system for stable.

I thought this thread said that.

Ok, so I should just revert it?

thanks,

greg k-h