Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:07:18 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test10-mm1
Message-ID: <20031126190718.GB1566@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
References: <20031125211518.6f656d73.akpm@osdl.org> <20031126085123.A1952@infradead.org> <20031126044251.3b8309c1.akpm@osdl.org> <20031126130936.A5275@infradead.org> <20031126052900.17542bb3.akpm@osdl.org> <20031126132505.C5477@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031126132505.C5477@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 915
Lines: 17

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:25:05PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:29:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > But I do not think that making a single kernel symbol inaccessible is an
> > appropriate way of resolving a GPFS licensing dispute.
> 
> well, GFPS is a derived work with or without it.  It's just that I remember
> we had that agreement about merging it only with the _GPL export.  In fact
> I'm pretty sure Paul told something about GPLed distributed filesystems from
> IBM in that context..

Are you trying to say that something that was ported from AIX is a derived
work because it has to read kernel internals to get its job done?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/