Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1539086718-4119-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
 <1539086718-4119-2-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com> <CANn89iL1BMCx3Mbsj3TijR3Srjji95q86px0k98r7JYJbwLzcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALOAHbBwGAqia_2xJSNkaX7TzSPN89bRz71qHRH43FtbwNTP6w@mail.gmail.com> <CANn89iKe4vETuo-FBZ8ZrovJGiimBbhbzBnbqawX_h0LA+8PoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iKe4vETuo-FBZ8ZrovJGiimBbhbzBnbqawX_h0LA+8PoA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 08:38:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CANn89i+-g5DEnrv0DSCsMq3fXo35mAaOmXvf1Tr22Ybif1OV0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: forbid direct reclaim if MSG_DONTWAIT is
 set in send path
To:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:58 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>

> We do not add bloat in the kernel if no application is ever going to
> use it, especially in the TCP fast path.
>

BTW, are you willing to change all memory allocations in the kernel as well ?

Let say an application is using a system call providing a pathname
(open(), stat(), ...), how this system call
is going to ask the kernel for no direct reclaim ?

Even allocating a socket with socket() or accept() has no ability to
avoid direct reclaim.

So tcp_sendmsg() is only the tip of the iceberg.