Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0000000000009d47b2057782bab4@google.com> <CAF=yD-+7NxN37Ez=3WXG0+2i6j30uSV8u9D7oJXEhp+SxzYCpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF=yD-+Qh5f9kqmYLY5EyUwNPuyhMpBxz6dh_kfzFZsgE3UijQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87va6bwlfg.fsf@linux.ibm.com> <48d891dd-3f45-c03c-a55b-bb153080881a@gmail.com>
 <CAF=yD-K3BeuUWf_2RhWoC6fx=+A49Nt1TOFOfzdwKfOdsv=TiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20181009170517.GA2821@splinter>
In-Reply-To: <20181009170517.GA2821@splinter>
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:09:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CANn89iKXvPmffDQDh_7musVioy8zEJ44ZxMa-kS0xn2ps9DYOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: general protection fault in __handle_mm_fault
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Cc:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
        aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
        syzbot+1577fbe983d20fe2e88f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:05 AM Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:02:58PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:00 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Well, this is a C repro, you can test this yourself instead of asking Willem who
> > > already did a painful bisection.
> >
> > Thanks Eric. It does take some effort to get the syzkaller environment
> > up and running [1] and I happen to have it ready, so I don't mind testing
> > a few patches.
>
> It is possible to ask syzbot to test the patch. I sent a couple of
> patches and got a response in 20-30 minutes. Very convenient.
>
> It is mentioned at the bottom of the report:
>
> "
> syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
> "

One day syzbot will do the bisection as well maybe, once it has a
repro, this could be really nice.