Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:05:17 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
        syzbot+1577fbe983d20fe2e88f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: general protection fault in __handle_mm_fault
Message-ID: <20181009170517.GA2821@splinter>
References: <0000000000009d47b2057782bab4@google.com>
 <CAF=yD-+7NxN37Ez=3WXG0+2i6j30uSV8u9D7oJXEhp+SxzYCpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF=yD-+Qh5f9kqmYLY5EyUwNPuyhMpBxz6dh_kfzFZsgE3UijQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87va6bwlfg.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
 <48d891dd-3f45-c03c-a55b-bb153080881a@gmail.com>
 <CAF=yD-K3BeuUWf_2RhWoC6fx=+A49Nt1TOFOfzdwKfOdsv=TiQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-K3BeuUWf_2RhWoC6fx=+A49Nt1TOFOfzdwKfOdsv=TiQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:02:58PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:00 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, this is a C repro, you can test this yourself instead of asking Willem who
> > already did a painful bisection.
> 
> Thanks Eric. It does take some effort to get the syzkaller environment
> up and running [1] and I happen to have it ready, so I don't mind testing
> a few patches.

It is possible to ask syzbot to test the patch. I sent a couple of
patches and got a response in 20-30 minutes. Very convenient.

It is mentioned at the bottom of the report:

"
syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
"