Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:22:17 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cc:     geert@linux-m68k.org, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ocfs2/dlmglue: lockdep_keys defined but not used
Message-ID: <20181009182217.GA18663@zn.tnic>
References: <20180704095318.19218-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
 <CAMuHMdWCyH-E9VA7ihsoXEq4dvLrPjYd01TYot6qja-psVRcog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADYN=9KH134zWogYt=FMMTgsYm6GEqBUY6=C453yj_NY=oq1hg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CADYN=9KH134zWogYt=FMMTgsYm6GEqBUY6=C453yj_NY=oq1hg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 03:07:03PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 23:07, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Anders,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:54 AM Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > When CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC isn't enabled lockdep_keys isn't used and
> > > we get a warning:
> > > fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c:99:30: warning: ‘lockdep_keys’ defined but not used
> > >     [-Wunused-variable]
> > >  static struct lock_class_key lockdep_keys[OCFS2_NUM_LOCK_TYPES];
> > >                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Adding __maybe_unused to the declaration hids the warning.
> >
> > Thanks for your patcj!
> >
> > > Fixes: 1cd75cdb8fbb ("ocfs2: make several functions and variables static (and some const)")
> >
> > Fixes: 480bd56485b77c36 ("ocfs2: make several functions and variables
> > static (and some const)")
> 
> Thanks, thats correct.
> 
> >
> > Presumably the branch got rebased?
> 
> probably.
> 
> Mark, Joel, do you want me to send a new patch where I correct the sha
> in the "Fixes" part of the changelog or can you fix that?

FWIW, I'm still seeing this in randconfig builds here.

Adding akpm in case no one picks this up.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.