Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: mfd: ds90ux9xx: add description of TI
 DS90Ux9xx ICs
From:   Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
To:     Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
References: <20181008211205.2900-1-vz@mleia.com>
 <20181008211205.2900-2-vz@mleia.com>
 <5631ac17-a1c1-af12-8b30-314880af42df@gmail.com>
 <4569f3e3-3812-f423-eda9-51e7a4d56a58@mleia.com>
Message-ID: <d7536af1-d78f-6d20-81a0-288be1d67f25@mleia.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 23:55:39 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4569f3e3-3812-f423-eda9-51e7a4d56a58@mleia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 10/09/2018 02:11 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> On 10/09/2018 03:13 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/08/2018 11:11 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> From: Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com>
>>>
>>> The change adds device tree binding description of TI DS90Ux9xx
>>> series of serializer and deserializer controllers which support video,
>>> audio and control data transmission over FPD-III Link connection.
>>>

[snip]

>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +- reg : Specifies the I2C slave address of a local de-/serializer.
>>> +- power-gpios : GPIO line to control supplied power to the device.
>>
>> Shouldn't this be regulator phandle ?
> 
> It could be, right. I'll ponder upon it.
> 

No, it can not.

The property describes PDB "Power-down Mode Input Pin", it is a control
pin with the predefined voltage, so regulator phandle is not applicable
here.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir