Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp494827imm; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:51:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63Vpz/eoJl+/9KhE03zylwj9yfBl/oZW2LKMqb/enUKuVLI5u9p9rjq6EpJewrk6JjMqOFi X-Received: by 2002:a63:6746:: with SMTP id b67-v6mr28776240pgc.310.1539150668883; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:51:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539150668; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zIQCP1jQohkq/y68OnBzOHYhz6BstvyqXxHMXmrKNdzIhtFSsJ66c2MDzATQMa7LdF J8x//txvrlNKCFr6rfxKpOHUghErwUSPBWfrGTXz4yHLEtGnShFvgTNmakSrxaeLNWFo cTO1w6sT/lrlMIPszf/r1Ok1DNJ9xtdtki4tpUlqSVWvvhdb0pZZhvqxDVdoU63Zysoj oXkyJjydsULrGWeb4Z7IS+jvD/+uZsyNNXVW4nhS5BdOynyWN0T9oOrrHyySR65Hu3mt RJW3s3+Lc6Y43IegtaqAB0E1q1n3qhRy64su0/0fXh4RllqR+Kr868gFR5IIPRh57wXh YVIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Hkp+ch1zuhZ/k99xKJ8KCt8lOnOib9i8r2xb7jyZ7E4=; b=Jk6w9ZPH6ru551VcpqO00JPTq1IZkC58S4miJXbDKZZJnHX6GDfDCK1ZJ/GfsRbQRD xqHKf7xVg7wQrvOtbZ3UE4Wn+zu3jmpeJn9sH1xp7vn9CjBPDs9981NwUi4BmIsp+JXS 9FtiGegurjw6jt6CTGbuT6tqFPF15T21y/lLA5EDPVMRS/S/vfe1gyJ3llwEjbgF1r+k uhziDOkru5+vpRRNqDRpYNjZ+7F4Cf1bu+gQVfU6gcSc+YtNzoE0mLIvOIYyIXeypixw eLpv7jjg8IU4JQaZYXwO0poE7u8R2FHWB+Y8+deQIijFcUnrSKsFsXXoL299mpCaDHa5 dzRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=m71kslpa; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t1-v6si23310833pgf.262.2018.10.09.22.50.54; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=m71kslpa; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726752AbeJJNLC (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:11:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:33940 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725864AbeJJNLB (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:11:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id l6-v6so3778280wrt.1 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:50:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Hkp+ch1zuhZ/k99xKJ8KCt8lOnOib9i8r2xb7jyZ7E4=; b=m71kslpaRLBGEDLY/ng3xg5DqFLPLz1pbDIr8k5GUyPGox/1EOFtqA0wzN9NvGxS9l YtfhUf3UDobC1pDX7zb683e/aEkkVEbYIsYG0Pl1pwLs/hVUzwg9JV65xQm5X2Q07s+g u/3/0T5r2oW68DTuJ7mXI2yq6XzaBMbdauUpOhgWwtsrRinS/ieMezBhv11dMCg68PhA St87bgq3UoMke44iFo59lY8qIaxy/HBWpU0FQU3zJ1glGboYkbycd/iHm0yl7dSmNlQp KQZpir3SZs5sfNMxIzzsi7uO9rqXc+j3iAR6fdK3isTnf536S1xviRn58NknrEKJVGr7 la/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Hkp+ch1zuhZ/k99xKJ8KCt8lOnOib9i8r2xb7jyZ7E4=; b=oNqfKuPFZIame2NRzWlwtZ9ssoITKDTKWi35jE1XCO2WFfLt/IXWTfsKk4WCIjD1yx GsZgQlwFkV0nTa+0DlWqAYgYY3zlGtSw/ZP5paB8vVs3+ZQ4OEkUJy0+f1FmMUsG++bC mBOiNxSJ2OaNWo0QJgs2BjvVaVxjeltQJR7T0cdW0Z21RCAv/vGZHd8QbjQHgnaeGukI C7eRGkHPgesiNa7L1zuxZm4t0nB5VCwqWyZXUPjYEJNfDKpNJbmoI9gWCoGkB1kAYqaI rvaJx9awgu43NoBJ3WbEUuV3js30CPRIYtsemnGFW9nO+/eYAczNxTXKFZYzgHwn+St4 blLw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfog/3LWwKEHXIr3k3ydkwX2+ExulIj4L4ErgsDr/wyhWZxp+Ivnq yWTpr3BhfkN4DsxJ39z0lQnvDb9f X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5501:: with SMTP id b1-v6mr21362594wrv.228.1539150629557; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e6-v6sm19905120wrc.70.2018.10.09.22.50.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:50:26 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yi Sun Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jgross@suse.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com, chao.gao@intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com, michael.h.kelley@microsoft.com, tianyu.lan@microsoft.com, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] locking/pvqspinlock, hv: Enable PV qspinlock for Hyper-V Message-ID: <20181010055026.GA17688@gmail.com> References: <1538987374-51217-1-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> <1538987374-51217-3-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> <20181009105427.GA102322@gmail.com> <20181010022536.GH11769@yi.y.sun> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181010022536.GH11769@yi.y.sun> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Yi Sun wrote: > On 18-10-09 12:54:27, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Yi Sun wrote: > > > > > Follow PV spinlock mechanism to implement the callback functions > > > to allow the CPU idling and kicking operations on Hyper-V. > > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) > > > + smp_ops.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = hv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu; > > > +#endif > > > > What's wrong with using the common pattern of: > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > > > > ? > > There is no difference between "#ifdef" and "#if defined". I just copied > it from "hv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu()". Do you need me submit a fix patch > after this set is merged? It's equivalent code, my point was that '#ifdef CONFIG_XYZ' is the shorter, more canonical pattern we use in the kernel most of the time, it's shorter, easier to read. We only use defined() for longer preprocessor directive conditions, and it's a pattern for "there's something more complex here than a simple CONFIG_XYZ dependency". Anyway, Thomas fixed it up in the latest iteration. Thanks, Ingo