Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp558323imm; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:07:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV634mBiZ13mMNevxjjZxncNA3tjELyAzRxI3MQTZPclR5SjwgBThMz/rKqcEULDPi5Rq2DNe X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8690:: with SMTP id g16-v6mr30939710plo.302.1539155274229; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:07:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539155274; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=R0geFpdnyEstjDuYTG9yGKHzf+3WEWCKrqZ06C3kx/v70DJ4xuD2NziiXDnprY6brh kWwwO27+JOI6mqidAVqFSkhfOtpgMi9MQ5Rjv1cdrOcPREknmOscJvYJ3WXXGRG2Jxly QKpA1+xpvSu7l9O7s1wkAvw4w4mx/5AjjCocK9lPQMu2ea4eFNn8TXPwVSOa4wYiK/sY kz7A4V6RvY258njo/JVahiUYfRRzf7u+ZD+9V8pruGUwf1tcdnsxije5XkiRaMyt+di1 yxxeYyv6nvT8GYma8SWs+FKMiEIrM9xNeDHu+U6BautaGj37Um+Yd/H7ue6iVarPbzgn B2qw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:date:message-id:autocrypt:openpgp:from:references:cc :to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=j4SQxxraYwbxSA3Vuazh5/46SWbgzIKF0EoPjx/6iYQ=; b=b7Hp2K/WMzOF2hyqs5sPcGBXxGnCcFP7ow+2KwoEjbyJbIJlukDOV8NFIB1RpITFsb yVxGiBGmTYCXDnTnXfgO96S13jJTxOgIMHsWrTnGWOClQkGSIBvR7StJFoazvcQjDuTY 71iiznQjmSxQZ0SB8su2tMOdp9YmRDBR0U/A2JLk7xbMm6sE0dviHKtDoqAoHKwH7LPE y0jnKGIl9OdB9Ij4H5U2KzLkUdpJkAS0MXItXIIwbkhhT0UJKVvLcWtnTS/jnbKwBde7 SF2ZHOlBkzbw7lX8LIXsd0cYYQdNJt2gTz37mQKecbJpsLAGM5q1O3B9DzYTSUWplkwl 74TQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=tTuN4VaY; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mailbox.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r28-v6si22956367pgu.410.2018.10.10.00.07.37; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:07:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=tTuN4VaY; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mailbox.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726758AbeJJO1s (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:27:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.212]:65052 "EHLO mx1.mailbox.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726479AbeJJO1s (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:27:48 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:2:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C2D49980; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:07:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:date:date:message-id:from:from:references:subject :subject:received; s=mail20150812; t=1539155219; bh=kw1l/GFQjUDE Vkze6FrcT/pdhwehIJ1iTRke+w/s+Y8=; b=tTuN4VaYZ6K+d1ORmW0WqPJGxIa7 xUcbirrHj34yDZzrb9NPQST/4sikcEauu8sGrsBGEws6jxILLMLhGSuLWd/74yXr 6TXFpllwFzebdfytAgWZCb9EaKsOmrUIH+oFS2Pya5QJSypj46CHuNFI3OBX2M0Q Bf8z8EPtHgxXHEmCcvxPL2JQGKV+gBq16CC/Vl5cfcA9GN+7I8E8L4DzvLeFf2gs OGL6U//3BF9owOc4rczZQTsJsHf+JsJxfFE0Yklv/tNyOoht73I5nG0zC6eKblK0 pbkZ0mbjwYMTz45UVuoOmzyKSLnQK7EdphbCZ3wp1K8VpTZEvu/PdQrRrw== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.116]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id 3_oX_Uvyl-N4; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:06:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses To: Josh Triplett Cc: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20181008152043.GA5796@localhost> <1718828.OxLgMoHbrt@siriux> <20181009185622.GA20960@localhost> From: Rainer Fiebig Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=jrf@mailbox.org; keydata= xsFNBFohwNMBEADSyoSeizfx3D4yl2vTXfNamkLDCuXDN+7P5/UbB+Kj/d4RTbA/w0fqu3S3 Kdc/mff99ypi59ryf8VAwd3XM19beUrDZVTU1/3VHn/gVYaI0/k7cnPpEaOgYseemBX5P2OV ZE/MjfQrdxs80ThMqFs2dV1eHnDyNiI3FRV8zZ5xPeOkwvXakAOcWQA7Jkxmdc3Zmc1s1q8p ZWz77UQ5RRMUFw7Z9l0W1UPhOwr/sBPMuKQvGdW+eui3xOpMKDYYgs7uN4Ftg4vsiMEo03i5 qrK0mfueA73NADuVIf9cB2STDywF/tF1I27r+fWns1x9j/hKEPOAf4ACrNUdwQ9qzu7Nj9rz 2WU8sjneqiiED2nKdzV0gDnFkvXY9HCFZR2YUC2BZNvLiUJ1PROFDdNxmdbLZAKok17mPyOR MU0VQ61+PNjS8nsnAml8jnpzpcvLcQxR7ejRAV6w+Dc7JwnuQOiPS6M7x5FTk3QTPL+rvLFJ 09Nb3ooeIQ/OUQoeM7pW8ll8Tmu2qSAJJ+3O002ADRVU1Nrc9tM5Ry9ht5zjmsSnFcSe2GoJ Knu1hyXHDAvcq/IffOwzdeVstdhotBpf058jlhFlfnaqXcOaaHZrlHtrKOfQQZrxXMfcrvyv iE2yhO8lUpoDOVuC1EhSidLd/IkCyfPjfIEBjQsQts7lepDgpQARAQABzSRSYWluZXIgRmll YmlnIDxqcmZpZWJpZ0BtYWlsYm94Lm9yZz7CwYIEEwECACwCGyMFCQlmAYAHCwkIBwMCAQYV CAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAUCWiLFEwIZAQAKCRDw4fcmJYr49Qq0D/4nkFpowFQphNzQfzH8 OR4Zh2ZLADZj3vuW/d4zEM9+K258WaHl9orLElwPjNOfyNwUtzJw31v/aMGEQ70lnKyD/VZz mTSamvk4br7ccLjnMV61edoj/hGpAYzBgiS7ibNPB62qsrjkKuXb1iPzg1GCJR34k264KHN7 jjz0Le1G0WYIndNfNV5/cm4+8LhEV+YE57fMJQCwG3WfOCthPoe03IUxWc/v9C3PaLRentE2 D0IFHqkBXYo3HwxZ7a95HFkeB7QUqHchEtOJ9M14841vLxz85z1t7AmkpaRfsHxigfQegAAf U4bLQzdsBSLAMHq7+EESHSE6XGpr4U2lk+MXEpN6jInwc38h22dJWt2Ycmv5ynjS3+sCVzXn ZukU8N5FUXgnidJnYcl3aeS1p7a3cho4PVJMGFF/ZUcbk0rsE6LrbKsiB8t7VziWCWMSpgyb DOA+Rk0Z3YIciKWme0xho2FhbPDeZU0+Ht9VXitb6ZVHLPO4JkQimOrCWlAwxgtQUsbSX0GE YCmYXWYw6r3J7rHoBK3LGh8lQu6nwQ1DYNnMxP0Gqj4lME6e2Uz1mGHrc7fz4HAzl98k6Hek 6IxVI5zK2+ez/xHyxSqkGWt6dq/zuCkwiScjjKUw86PGWwmerSCdsCXcLLK8zwCucoyNY9NV 2bMXkkcTXsUrmgnlus7BTQRaIcDTARAAwhbtQAUmZG/rkpR/6/xr7jRqi5Z3M5LZNw4lW9k4 nBpQDAP/rLVuREnz/upm314P9i5iN9g2wsbReZBJ9KiUxT39KD5p99KZGIH0elgZy+nDnb3o QLbtAr8+ox1ThOyOEJ7iX378txc1JD9IWJuv6YLMlkXa4ZuuAMCqKUvCChEjcHhZ+Ecb8OX8 GwIKUoklWhoHR7OcMqAkjdhA698FkWNkgIeqMiTN/hBJ9u010ZeB82ibDAKSMetMRxflCwTh rVrfrOr5+ZkJvoN5r+Jy1ulk8OOnDOjvqXoUcee5zdloZymeY3f7zebddvPmuiR0qXX0KYeS bhNF1GugLgbYeU2ev0nZ74F6vTwLUraRjKUzk0bq6SELlNMriS2xWj7zDB2XtzUdTHPYSgFD KGYxRqiM7KJbheCL7gD1wxUGRf14yJISXmDX/fZhsFrZ/NF3UqxJnLCz9lqyMCvT8prJjlAQ u0zcFcrGAYVBNeJMAKlukMllRMgWdSLmJQiDC5JMaXoEeXdGpIv8LgH+yU3tkKjXvkjwGywc XuL28ZScap3iJj08B8HWHmlL5b3pCkZv1w87SSF+FarrWl4F4u4Uj+u2r7/NEZVmJ0GpNHNw kYFQiX1Coky6+Ga1/gXUBP6grI9eZOMD+qtsJC1JVPY8VIsjq/47R1tBTKoiANQ/M+MAEQEA AcLBZQQYAQIADwUCWiHA0wIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRDw4fcmJYr49T45EADMYWeyxZQi7bG3Iv1N 485kMVhs/90ojJAEoBOldihdEvZatH21JVLmMbb0toAYXz8NZ9Npmzk7isrhigjy58Xob4cd I4SPg6WMVSuGBhpVSrProQcW3BdsaBqyHBJXMpDKZlmoZug2ia7cP2kk5H4D1Trcu//x+78Q Xh14g+hValrgphRSxuygdbDlhqBe3rqh5IK0UUh9pBeLjUvh8a3mqnjZI+xJWSlYVZ3qDnlW uKGc/1uotXYUKVDtBgTTt8AerGX+1PIaosOUr1fSE6158XP353EyABDglrkZsJL4PF3kE73c 8e+z4+lY1VVF4VKaoC6KU9mJEhcJSsz5OOHpBgz4TR6XjumL5+f7+7hEaI6sIvjSNDp97ZMJ NPf5iznOn8FFA0EeENttOnibbw6WHMtIsHVN8axqLgBIT04bidgpj57FinbcnJewqYiOQtHu 1/edHTQsfHXx2HcxLiyuDxXX1yJ+Tv2ZeQPSliH68KUYP2y/8tNS4MeF8/QLmMAZ9Cux37ZF EmdsS4XF92CpI09dB3NOQiXBv3qUBTHHDYH04esCC+kJoZck7O1LP2EMMzQyVUPBW91Y8W/0 bMeoZrfbN7hsvrnH60PqXlTvpZPnlK6VnH/bl0rf2cOSmOeJUfreToMYwWCtEhKq7YYxJQ8M 6/dT7HxuwnVIkER8kg== Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:08:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181009185622.GA20960@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Josh Triplett schrieb: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 08:29:24PM +0200, Rainer Fiebig wrote: >> Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2018, 08:20:44 schrieb Josh Triplett: >>> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 02:36:39PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: >>>> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing >>>> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since >>>> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch >>>> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by >>>> the project to correct this ambiguity. >>> >>> Upstream has now adopted a FAQ, which addresses this and many other >>> questions. See https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq . >>> >>> Might I suggest adding that link to the bottom of the document, instead? >>> (And then, optionally, submitting entries for that FAQ.) >>> >> >> The Code of Conflict has 28 lines, including the heading. >> The Code of Conduct has 81 lines, including the heading. And it needs a FAQ. Hm. > > Yes, it turns out to be a more complicated problem than it was > previously oversimplified to. People don't automatically share a common > understanding. > I don't know what that complicated problem was. The commit message is a bit vaque in that respect. But I bet that in the end it *was* simple. And it probably wasn't that people felt discriminated because of their "body size". I also think that people actually do share a common understanding. Otherwise *no* CoC would work - however explicit it would be. We're not that different after all. A CoC that needs a FAQ to be understood may create more problems that it solves. So long! Rainer Fiebig