Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:02:38 +0800
From:   Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        jgross@suse.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
        isaku.yamahata@intel.com, michael.h.kelley@microsoft.com,
        tianyu.lan@microsoft.com, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] locking/pvqspinlock, hv: Enable PV qspinlock for
 Hyper-V
Message-ID: <20181010080238.GI11769@yi.y.sun>
References: <1538987374-51217-1-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
 <1538987374-51217-3-git-send-email-yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
 <20181009105427.GA102322@gmail.com>
 <20181010022536.GH11769@yi.y.sun>
 <20181010055026.GA17688@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181010055026.GA17688@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 18-10-10 07:50:26, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 18-10-09 12:54:27, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Follow PV spinlock mechanism to implement the callback functions
> > > > to allow the CPU idling and kicking operations on Hyper-V.
> > > 
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > > > +	smp_ops.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = hv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu;
> > > > +#endif
> > > 
> > > What's wrong with using the common pattern of:
> > > 
> > > 	#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > 
> > > ?
> > 
> > There is no difference between "#ifdef" and "#if defined". I just copied
> > it from "hv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu()". Do you need me submit a fix patch
> > after this set is merged?
> 
> It's equivalent code, my point was that '#ifdef CONFIG_XYZ' is the shorter, more canonical 
> pattern we use in the kernel most of the time, it's shorter, easier to read. We only use 
> defined() for longer preprocessor directive conditions, and it's a pattern for "there's 
> something more complex here than a simple CONFIG_XYZ dependency".
> 
> Anyway, Thomas fixed it up in the latest iteration.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo

Thank you! I will notice it in the future.

BRs,
Yi Sun