Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:53:08 +0100
From:   Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the
 enforcement paragraph pending community discussion
Message-ID: <20181010165308.187aae51@alans-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <20181008172303.4f06cd94@coco.lan>
References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
        <1538861851.4088.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
        <20181008172303.4f06cd94@coco.lan>
Organization: Intel Corporation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> -Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
> +Maintainers may remove, edit, or reject
>  comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
>  not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any
>  contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening,
> 
> The previous text seems too much legal for my taste.
> 

That is just as confusing. Maintainers have the right to remove, edit,
reject commits that *are* aligned with the code as well. So what exactly
is the point here ?

Alan