Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264472AbTK0Kgr (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:36:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264473AbTK0Kgr (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:36:47 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:51105 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264472AbTK0Kgp (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:36:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:36:43 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Neil Brown , Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: md/raid devices don't show up in /proc/partitions in 2.6 :-( Message-ID: <20031127103643.GB4954@marowsky-bree.de> References: <16325.16910.697589.124844@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <16325.16910.697589.124844@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 993 Lines: 28 On 2003-11-27T11:15:10, Neil Brown said: > I just noticed that md devices do not show up in /proc/partitions in > 2.6. Using /proc/partitions for finding the existing block devices / partitions does seem to be kind of obsolete, as sysfs exports all of this information too? So, if anything, I'd drop the confusing redundancy and kill /proc/partitions - the names there may have little resemblance to how udev (et al) chose to name the device node in the filesystem anyway. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter. SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better. Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/