Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp1472715imm; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:27:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60Pj9q4oPnsBISaAvznoNthxQ2azyrfwymH68HVGCN190SWFnfTetJhjLa+PPunJUWQjgiq X-Received: by 2002:a62:a50d:: with SMTP id v13-v6mr24699434pfm.18.1539210455600; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:27:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539210455; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c7UVvMGEDKhiQWgfOthzmNlUzpYbWy9R98lo0JtUAD/ow4F6qmGfBnjAYk7M1tTxMl Ripxytf4ue0SEYIV+YoFlcogdCMQ28BWsRW29XV2RMtjUgFq4/mYhFacOWZOWjBLulQF +x7KwL4p6sfKxh82EQ8Ehqk/Y2rMvJrFZWPL0Lg577/Z+iqU5qKZsvzsBsXcEjRavfv1 e6kXgdtqWYIuOtobSFHvzgVNzHC3SiEjSzNsQ9HXCSUf71x7rEZ6xo0ruLDZQb0UPk70 kuymwkMMN03cIdzm2HFIGWdSvRZLY3bYBE6aRS2AU5cSe2nZ0FLq4lYuJLJel5Crp6UC 56jg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=umBP5So35ufXVXLMvbPlWfpkT0FN7jIJT0RT9aqgsps=; b=q/yqFqwa7mxhKDENV9A16bq9IFAEVw75jui3yfLx5+1DlxANJczf+jfES+YyKwgWsW ugYNju4TwnwnfWVfye6NBBNnTVGyTWzXDKNkMJldoAHCleKdC7pDsDqJkvjq+gVm26hB QAhffsiBwzK+rD4K/B3UmunzCFIQcAbsVhwGeeKcPX1oH+yWBmFtrfmfmwQmshBDNSIC lQUOh5nFJ17i/xe41wuPU2aokUwteXftYaiS2hhHm7Cmi0Vd1DkYjRZ0MUuiycmRYiO9 Ah7PgHOIP/GemwGePIY3O91V1nARpOfkMFKAwuZ2XpW4qvMDqcVAa8d8f1Cs+VrRfGsN QEsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r28-v6si25025516pgu.410.2018.10.10.15.27.20; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726036AbeJKFvJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:51:09 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44956 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725968AbeJKFvJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:51:09 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-4-154-175.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.154.175]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A4AFD7D; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:26:55 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Keith Busch Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kirill Shutemov , Dave Hansen , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm/gup_benchmark: Time put_page Message-Id: <20181010152655.8510270e5db753f6666f12d3@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20181010195605.10689-1-keith.busch@intel.com> References: <20181010195605.10689-1-keith.busch@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:56:00 -0600 Keith Busch wrote: > We'd like to measure time to unpin user pages, so this adds a second > benchmark timer on put_page, separate from get_page. > > Adding the field will breaks this ioctl ABI, but should be okay since > this an in-tree kernel selftest. > > ... > > --- a/mm/gup_benchmark.c > +++ b/mm/gup_benchmark.c > @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ > #define GUP_FAST_BENCHMARK _IOWR('g', 1, struct gup_benchmark) > > struct gup_benchmark { > - __u64 delta_usec; > + __u64 get_delta_usec; > + __u64 put_delta_usec; > __u64 addr; > __u64 size; > __u32 nr_pages_per_call; If we move put_delta_usec to the end of this struct, the ABI remains back-compatible?