Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp1560790imm; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:23:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60UQ3yUCoOtjYmEDnGMJzCKUKhfo47nQ+PFR6GwtSWIeRQ8P4ui/zWrqtbHxoA56BovNp1U X-Received: by 2002:a63:9a42:: with SMTP id e2-v6mr31880307pgo.340.1539217390897; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:23:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539217390; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XiLui1O+9iAf2JvBWdX+D6cyuvJYKkiaCjTaiVUFdNwLeigWR10+wOes/sPRHPvnVe HgfNYZpagq5ijQTmd5uy2rSjOq7w8eCHIcUvH/vJpv6ItsfCviudVGbr9BfiZYOc5lvQ /kixgAMbR+YH9/xFf0YQY2fCltXt3mNQ4PhcyeMBzfbeaZDVGKCvMAotoo9uMeOuTIW9 7UOIEiguzjri1Mn7sqHZ50v5h1cxu7xAzeO/RfnSjtYYJBJUMDPW6Y0+tcQEJH1vkbYy iohkGPtdkozlrJ3zi+ZuybTI0vIl40SkkiHQ1fQJX4/grV9h2me1Rk44NEJtNm0BjF/1 TD0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=++wBCbk+aM9E9hMzSF3kZZi/rAYSgTV1ch6estRq95Y=; b=S7YmTRdL4utLKWVU/PAErxW25mm/B++6/D4UiKHGd+z62vMA3jCCdqUQFg+WAgv0Cr zHlWhvDLuP1B0LtvPVE8d5G4DbBPrLpkeyzvj3t0KOoy0NeWrOND7oQ5C/v0945nrHTE uO3hZ73L/OW7L9kppdSBpn77OA1Rzy4j72VqxxwfAdMQHSvq7ObfbRgTOcbMvFVMLv8v 3OI2TlFoatoRc203LSqk5JJ9mf9/eBU76IzCAq8H+iVM1NnMF4y/6z3az4VEiFz3H9HV SnJJX1o/8wVistsi4JmaNMzrJLEhp540KbPrYslg35foLj+7PlRTRj6cEBd17+kqhomi 6ZsA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y129-v6si24062749pgy.551.2018.10.10.17.22.56; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726168AbeJKHqA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 03:46:00 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57892 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725969AbeJKHqA (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 03:46:00 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-4-154-175.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.154.175]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73A87D57; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:21:23 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: David Hildenbrand , Mike Rapoport , Stephen Rothwell , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the jc_docs tree Message-Id: <20181010172123.cf95ff7f81ad86f3a1c119d3@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20181008083228.33ec7c1d@lwn.net> References: <20181008183840.70ebfe94@canb.auug.org.au> <20181008081315.GB6772@rapoport-lnx> <6ab76538-b836-3b22-cb29-102c613091cf@redhat.com> <20181008083228.33ec7c1d@lwn.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 08:32:28 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:38:29 +0200 > David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > I can do the renaming and add the patch > > > > > > "memory-hotplug.txt: add some details about locking internals" > > > > > > on top of the jc_docs tree. > > > > > > Does it sound Ok? > > > > > > > Fine with me. > > Works for me too. > > Andrew, what is your preference for mm docs patches going forward? It > seems we should try to focus them on one tree or the other. My preference > would be to keep carrying them to avoid conflicts elsewhere, but I can > certainly direct them youward if you'd rather they went that way. Gee. Case-by-case, I guess. A lot of these changes are three-line alterations as part of a larger patch which necessitated that alteration.