Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181004140547.13014-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20181004140547.13014-9-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <m1lg7474ps.fsf@dinechin.org>
In-Reply-To: <m1lg7474ps.fsf@dinechin.org>
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:18:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CALCETrVPOv-7K0ihvSy-5bLJqpxA8D=8wJeZGzrP_=b7aDiAcg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] x86/fpu: Always store the registers in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe()
To:     christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:50 AM Christophe de Dinechin
<christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
>
> > From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> >
> > copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() has two callers and both invoke the function only if
> > fpu->initialized is set.
>
> One of the callers is in a different file.
> Not sure if that warrants some kind of check that
> fpu->initialized is set?

I still kind of think that fpu->initialized should be removed entirely
as part of this series.  Keeping unnecessary complication around in
the FPU code increaseds the scope for interesting bugs and makes
understanding the code considerably harder.