Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262198AbTK1Noz (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:44:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262224AbTK1Noz (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:44:55 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:57512 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262198AbTK1Noy (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:44:54 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: Question - non-exec stack Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:44:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <000701c3b5b3$addfbac0$34dfa7c8@bsb.virtua.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zuaVjU1pAgX/naP7R2LZ94uwrNQ= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 12 "Breno" writes: > I?d like to know how non-exec stack can run on 32 bits processor. On 32bits > processor vm_exec and vm_read has the same flags . So your tasks will not > run very well. This doesn't have anything to do with the CPU word size, does it? I guess you mean 32 bit Intel processors. -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru@kth.se - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/