Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262251AbTK1N45 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:56:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262283AbTK1N45 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:56:57 -0500 Received: from [65.248.4.67] ([65.248.4.67]:18582 "EHLO verdesmares.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262251AbTK1N44 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:56:56 -0500 Message-ID: <001501c3b5b7$84c5bd20$34dfa7c8@bsb.virtua.com.br> From: "Breno" To: , =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= References: <000701c3b5b3$addfbac0$34dfa7c8@bsb.virtua.com.br> Subject: Re: Question - non-exec stack Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:57:09 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1063 Lines: 35 Yes , 32 bit Intel processors Breno ----- Original Message ----- From: "M?ns Rullg?rd" To: Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 11:44 AM Subject: Re: Question - non-exec stack "Breno" writes: > I?d like to know how non-exec stack can run on 32 bits processor. On 32bits > processor vm_exec and vm_read has the same flags . So your tasks will not > run very well. This doesn't have anything to do with the CPU word size, does it? I guess you mean 32 bit Intel processors. -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru@kth.se - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/