Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8251564f-ba7a-1777-a606-dec472b32f35@canonical.com>
References: <20181011001846.30964-1-keescook@chromium.org> <CAGXu5jLBaHj5MhXaK-8zdu6Rgo2B6rEq+at17xZ1Puct+YUajQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZhaXhoElmWQlsxHmgFHpB2xSWzJYFZWBasrSKQNjGj4_T2A4AY2F9v1rP9LkUfilUbZ0ExWXX9koLNjUM8S6baX6xfSSMPXY_CpihbCetVc=@protonmail.ch>
 <CAGXu5j+kekUdcE2EhUu__8MXJ1O+D=-zTXLGNCRVa_VyDxePpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <f68e5f4b-6360-a9e7-597f-89d1d3ca73c1@canonical.com> <32stV62RmME8Dj5jKB8Z03zPe_Et72kMo71D8SpgSOHUo6SaROc8DomMWdk5jDGpyqVd8T63NIIK2NdDw95clpF8Uj47Wca2FBFItXDRh7E=@protonmail.ch>
 <38dde301-d77e-35fd-88d4-5cdc5b570ee8@canonical.com> <_CkJnKYmEZ4ZF0JtsSYuahAd9sgnX9OtcstjXaeqb8wn5uxfimc6S4jomly7If9VqnOXqXwaiCbJ9ttS6NiqE7n6cQUlwLvfO53paLmacvU=@protonmail.ch>
 <8251564f-ba7a-1777-a606-dec472b32f35@canonical.com>
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:01:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+2yVZ5DQHyqvJKnSYYqRCzeMtEabBwYFOWkTcwMUWhEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering
To:     John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc:     Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Friday, October 12, 2018 3:19 AM, John Johansen
<john.johansen@canonical.com> wrote:
> It isn't perfect but it manages consistency across distros as best as
> can be achieved atm.

Yeah, this is why I'm okay with the current series: it provides as
consistent a view as possible, but leaves room for future improvements
(like adding "+" or "!" or "all" or whatever).

I'm curious to see what SELinux folks think of v5, though. I *think* I
addressed all the concerns there, even Paul's "I want my distro
default to not have extreme stacking" case too.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security