Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] arch/x86: Rename the RDT functions and
 definitions
To:     "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "fenghua.yu@intel.com" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        "james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
        "vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com" <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
        "tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc:     "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "pombredanne@nexb.com" <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
        "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "kstewart@linuxfoundation.org" <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>,
        "rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        "ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        "kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        "xiaochen.shen@intel.com" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>,
        "colin.king@canonical.com" <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        "Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>,
        "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
        "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        "dwmw@amazon.co.uk" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
        "luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
        "jroedel@suse.de" <jroedel@suse.de>,
        "jannh@google.com" <jannh@google.com>,
        "dima@arista.com" <dima@arista.com>,
        "jpoimboe@redhat.com" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        "vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20181011203223.18157-1-babu.moger@amd.com>
 <20181011203223.18157-3-babu.moger@amd.com>
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Message-ID: <80310bdc-9b46-78a5-1920-4d7411348725@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:40:16 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181011203223.18157-3-babu.moger@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Babu,

On 10/11/2018 1:33 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> @@ -883,20 +883,20 @@ static int __init intel_rdt_late_init(void)
>  	rdt_online = state;
>  
>  	for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource(r)
> -		pr_info("Intel RDT %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
> +		pr_info("RESCTRL %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
>  
>  	for_each_mon_capable_rdt_resource(r)
> -		pr_info("Intel RDT %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
> +		pr_info("RESCTRL %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
>  

I'm sorry - I know it was me who suggested the change to RESCTRL but I
clearly did not consider the final result which is (for example):

resctrl: RESCTRL %s allocation detected

Perhaps we could just drop that RESCTRL text?

Reinette