Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 22:26:34 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] x86/pkeys: Drop the preempt-disable section
Message-ID: <20181012202633.xj5jkg753b6uf6s7@linutronix.de>
References: <20181004140547.13014-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20181004140547.13014-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <1351ba57-1e17-1d76-63c2-0eead2cc5f3b@linux.intel.com>
 <CALCETrVm1ZygpEz+912BcMgTAPznB24uYsB1yQ_V4YQa2N-DzQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVm1ZygpEz+912BcMgTAPznB24uYsB1yQ_V4YQa2N-DzQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2018-10-12 11:07:28 [-0700], Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> All these "if" statements in the FPU code are messy and make
> understanding and reviewing this code hard.
> 
> Can you prepare a patch for the beginning of your series that removes
> fpu->initialized and just ensures that the fpu is always initialized?
> This will regress performance, but you should get all that performance
> back with TIF_LOAD_FPU.

okay, will do.

Sebastian