Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263564AbTK1XlS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:41:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263568AbTK1XlS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:41:18 -0500 Received: from chaos.sr.unh.edu ([132.177.249.105]:1952 "EHLO chaos.sr.unh.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263564AbTK1XlR (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:41:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:40:32 -0500 (EST) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.sr.unh.edu To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu cc: Tonnerre Anklin , Werner Cornelius , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [I4L] hfcpci missing MODULE_LICENSE In-Reply-To: <200311280322.hAS3M602016305@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > which says: "I guess the license is meant to be GPL." And so it was almost > certainly intended to be. > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > MODULE_AUTHOR("Kai Germaschewski /Werner Cornelius "); > > > Unfortunately, neither you nor I nor anybody but Kai or Werner (or their > assignees) can do this, as I understand the law. The only proper resolutions > here are to get one of them to make some sort of statement (I suspect even a > "Yea, it's GPL, we just forgot the macro" e-mail from one of them would be good > enough), or to pull the code out of the 2.6.0 tree till it *is* resolved. Yes, it's GPL, it actually even says so in the comment at the beginning of the file. It's based on Werner's original driver which was GPL, and the work I contributed to the Linux kernel is GPL too, of course. --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/