Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp3406696imm; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:45:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61sHxiN0YcTIWwLSdJa6N27GAdwQVQ0BaZOEoO7cihsUswtbQk0xoSUMCAVepfCBmVw4g3f X-Received: by 2002:a62:5887:: with SMTP id m129-v6mr15623223pfb.254.1539571545586; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:45:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539571545; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jkjTQj0Dcr8WwjHRQUQsXtPkz9uESLky4gLRC4ecCHlMIieHx9MDl14AvCpQGwGqYZ 3JKubyR1j80Yi/Sww1JJgQGEePFIRwuyTdHmmjpGQ/SaItytbyXMH1sTnrXkd+TwNB4o IWo1QgwIMYoK15xCrdvmtimrjKfmPIF8Uvrefl7ouYo2B76zgX+F1O6nTwtxBSB4TCq5 1BkXWuL01AdtMstjDBU79kQOjDlxN+vL6xXGkRzG+mldv6LA+9qk9zY4F9meXX9fxGrS a/G+KppWvd7opoA1NyryRgDsTkDFhh3Xw7NI45ra4BJWJwe9u2Vh7/7nkahjYviZWXBV FNcQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=jo8BNaPb8Vn9C2gMxctEuQyXYbOvhl8DwMOEhCVrplU=; b=J8pr+9RE1jxYd13vfoCIC98q9RzH2sSLdN77gdg9WOaMagtaOCExodZsigUInNlk0E LwIjuGMx3Z2KGjU07OEjnCExS2eXmV9v+A017g6E7TlkilHQVooRqKUTtxFl+xyJU6XJ jE8TPkbpqzGMbp7NiQbxGMgsrCNu7u3jY2rsJSk6lbd+KSinBrVw19CCbFqUINyTXsTr jPqeDC5KrDHY6ZRhIIKo6Qzcf8lLGWvjOrcVnKjtcorKokmA+vSvFxCNRW5WUalN4NRa tzIOnGqcc9oiPgq54SfdfyAbzksemis7LFt2XSIB8lL522sPwAKgA9DNX32gjqZYiFlT A/7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s136-v6si9447079pgc.7.2018.10.14.19.45.30; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726541AbeJOK1I (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 06:27:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43778 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726262AbeJOK1H (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 06:27:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362A5C012780; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 02:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-121-116.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.121.116]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAC41057063; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 02:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 22:43:50 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: Tiwei Bie , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wexu@redhat.com, jfreimann@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 6/8] vhost: packed ring support Message-ID: <20181014224208-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1531711691-6769-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <1531711691-6769-7-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <20181012143244.GA28400@debian> <20181012131812-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <447f47fa-32dd-a408-dd81-13a9839e0748@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <447f47fa-32dd-a408-dd81-13a9839e0748@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 02:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:22:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018年10月13日 01:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:32:44PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:28:09AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > [...] > > > > @@ -1367,10 +1397,48 @@ long vhost_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *arg > > > > vq->last_avail_idx = s.num; > > > > /* Forget the cached index value. */ > > > > vq->avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx; > > > > + if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) { > > > > + vq->last_avail_wrap_counter = wrap_counter; > > > > + vq->avail_wrap_counter = vq->last_avail_wrap_counter; > > > > + } > > > > break; > > > > case VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE: > > > > s.index = idx; > > > > s.num = vq->last_avail_idx; > > > > + if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) > > > > + s.num |= vq->last_avail_wrap_counter << 31; > > > > + if (copy_to_user(argp, &s, sizeof(s))) > > > > + r = -EFAULT; > > > > + break; > > > > + case VHOST_SET_VRING_USED_BASE: > > > > + /* Moving base with an active backend? > > > > + * You don't want to do that. > > > > + */ > > > > + if (vq->private_data) { > > > > + r = -EBUSY; > > > > + break; > > > > + } > > > > + if (copy_from_user(&s, argp, sizeof(s))) { > > > > + r = -EFAULT; > > > > + break; > > > > + } > > > > + if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) { > > > > + wrap_counter = s.num >> 31; > > > > + s.num &= ~(1 << 31); > > > > + } > > > > + if (s.num > 0xffff) { > > > > + r = -EINVAL; > > > > + break; > > > > + } > > > Do we want to put wrap_counter at bit 15? > > I think I second that - seems to be consistent with > > e.g. event suppression structure and the proposed > > extension to driver notifications. > > Ok, I assumes packed virtqueue support 64K but looks not. I can change it to > bit 15 and GET_VRING_BASE need to be changed as well. > > > > > > > > If put wrap_counter at bit 31, the check (s.num > 0xffff) > > > won't be able to catch the illegal index 0x8000~0xffff for > > > packed ring. > > > > > Do we need to clarify this in the spec? Isn't this all internal vhost stuff? > > > > + vq->last_used_idx = s.num; > > > > + if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) > > > > + vq->last_used_wrap_counter = wrap_counter; > > > > + break; > > > > + case VHOST_GET_VRING_USED_BASE: > > > Do we need the new VHOST_GET_VRING_USED_BASE and > > > VHOST_SET_VRING_USED_BASE ops? > > > > > > We are going to merge below series in DPDK: > > > > > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/45874/ > > > > > > We may need to reach an agreement first. > > If we agree that 64K virtqueue won't be supported, I'm ok with either. Well the spec says right at the beginning: Packed virtqueues support up to 2 15 entries each. > Btw the code assumes used_wrap_counter is equal to avail_wrap_counter which > looks wrong? > > Thanks > > > > > > > > + s.index = idx; > > > > + s.num = vq->last_used_idx; > > > > + if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) > > > > + s.num |= vq->last_used_wrap_counter << 31; > > > > if (copy_to_user(argp, &s, sizeof s)) > > > > r = -EFAULT; > > > > break; > > > [...]