Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp3789542imm; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 04:20:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60H7j4Ccz+QeKRH1Vx1cFweLw+8bYhft2cs8qdaz8rLP5ekAGzsRR1hVKP7OS5DBT2G/L8n X-Received: by 2002:a62:2315:: with SMTP id j21-v6mr17362916pfj.90.1539602404476; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 04:20:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539602404; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C76pGKxRMZYWRvyUEveLG5l7gAxAjIJPRHFIRxpMGnySdIWd2Vnsi08nHsAUdXn17v A66Kn6qiciCMmRs4GZS22OmP/XYouwp98ZLpzXysgu4eeAoPQtWH7NrSM1/ZYqFKS3bq fCBBPruxAnuIoKfKU2vKObKoXHKcpkT1aKGOsYvaOwNfoS6pKBt2VCY+WZo7/uiHU6o1 /v+W4oLw4Y/q+z1QEQIMv/LocUGKKo8OknsXl0Pmb0Pk6nd+GnVHJ/e1Kof0lxBt+DN3 1RcKCB9ojrRILK+gRGJ0q3f8JCMIELWJO1R6omNoZxvnjC7L3oRaln97L0KZiA7p8sSk JO9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=0fhjRi0IZsWTrn+CmyFc+IvmMCB9ze6oQEqY2rT5gBs=; b=cpq/Ri0mjseAwmiITb49nDwimK3ec/fgvrA62aWU1rTzisD0WNU33HyOG1Ub82iEXJ +pXySYRjycYd0yTyVhaQyxwVEEB7oL2yk9Wu40jPd/Dlyv3EAtPhRCg9Tc4fuOaDLRWb xtgJaqBhdSXLFh7pePXDw9UF/ckOvQpMLarP5/Vrx+PQwHrfT2Fb1KdiqDWZeGBJGzF4 /zNhI0noimwHpnWjljB7SbC6lsGBLtZKzVZMK8+iKmWQRH8Qm0cgndD2iX840dwxDLZc Wvrs5XLS9LqUi+MEsscI21c9XvHYy9uc4OPOChfMzw+Ea49KGUKHKrgPcspogJmKBRvH r8UA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23-v6si10276207pgk.424.2018.10.15.04.19.49; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 04:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726681AbeJOTDk (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:03:40 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38610 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726456AbeJOTDk (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:03:40 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9126DAD49; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:18:43 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dave Young Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , thomas.lendacky@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, Lianbo Jiang , bhe@redhat.com, tiwai@suse.de, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, hpa@zytor.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error Message-ID: <20181015111843.GB10240@zn.tnic> References: <153805773703.1157.14773321497580233478.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <153805811578.1157.6948388946904655969.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20180930092110.GB6950@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20180930092741.GC6950@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20181015045138.GA9719@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20181015045138.GA9719@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:51:38PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > Since the fix of checking the end is in another patch, probably merge > > these two patches so that they are in one patch to avoid break bisect. > > Not sure if above comment was missed, Boris, would you mind to fold the > patch 1 and 2? Without any further explanation about a potential bisection breaking, there's nothing I can do. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)