Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264438AbTK2XOT (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:14:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264490AbTK2XOT (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:14:19 -0500 Received: from intra.cyclades.com ([64.186.161.6]:17624 "EHLO intra.cyclades.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264438AbTK2XOF (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:14:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:10:44 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@logos.cnet To: Samuel Flory Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , , Subject: Re: libata in 2.4.24? In-Reply-To: <3FC91D22.8030404@rackable.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Samuel Flory wrote: > Are you considering including libata support for 2.4.24? From my > testing with a number of different embedded sata chipsets (mostly ICH, > SI, and Promise) it appears very stable. I'm not seeing any data > corruption or lockups when running Cerberus with 2.4.23-rc5 + libata > patch. The only troubles I've had were with initialization of embedded > promise sata controllers. (I still need to test with Jeff's latest fixes > for this.) I'm happy to include it in 2.4 when Jeff thinks its stable enough for a stable series. ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/