Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp4897347imm; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61RaM25BgPFMycTXe8JjgsetZWRs1UQQGnakh4tjfsMpPXOTbMNWe3W43DC1l/Yinbs5TuO X-Received: by 2002:a63:3152:: with SMTP id x79-v6mr19466598pgx.323.1539679172586; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539679172; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ktBA7pSDuLHCHflnyjlMVatwK3JjPSvAxJMCuTaUvSJUObloWWYHN4P1DUE3JySGp2 MaYzQQ00okTw06CFtqSjrx8GUaRDBz5Y7uLUt1FYJksGQ8q0UAesTX49a8nrFS69CsQt c8YfpFhMVO8B0k8Gki+Dt3fDQuk/AoAtdQtPNmWcMFJi45N6ON+n69JuegYDMTPRTIGN +VaNJH55F7R0Lq62Bt+KJ9QVAVfiCFn8o9LGn8hgdaDhhLkKHlqMiYGrxPbpjCwAaDaU Ym0/qWITo41CYxgoYU/08aaeFJVjrxG3C62pf4iWhb5Yf+EVxqq1iU/wcirdv4+zYzNF PKAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=CmjxILSLckdTk4VqFiMknHvz+k2F2qfis6I24orhIiU=; b=OFGcF42CE7wBhZOsTl8dBirTtRbxi/28+IhT0K7OOWK4vMwU9c35yZDWsycplCIxJZ ILZT3jEPtmt/HznwHUBISR2a/WzYc3u5Br5OWKVga+9LA+CvoJQ4xMrlpq8b87N7mZpv 7pf1WZpLbhuER4zthJ+5KvqPJl5blKYOnfNmyfPrDy/VFwGS6gNarj1J5GPJhvDsN5rp DWnmQJbwqwLHBOHkjYUdttRNFlo9y4/fGSmzPWGSPtvNXBptMYIEjVr0+Rrz6u16UHnc fZ9uwdTOzjsOo+1AVCYRmDIrMJVCi/SUpexuv6wsiuBC53cmLcI9c6M0AU2DMYK2NT8J j5Tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h28-v6si13070963pgm.67.2018.10.16.01.37.32; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727197AbeJPQWj (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 12:22:39 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:38738 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726165AbeJPQWj (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 12:22:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A3020087; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:26:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTYmoSsLuxKr; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:26:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (mail-essen-01.secunet.de [10.53.40.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25B2B20082; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:26:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:26:36 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AFF0D3182995; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:26:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:26:36 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Michal Kubecek CC: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: use complete IPv6 addresses for hash Message-ID: <20181016082636.GY3823@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20181012122444.0448FA0ED9@unicorn.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181012122444.0448FA0ED9@unicorn.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-G-Data-MailSecurity-for-Exchange-State: 0 X-G-Data-MailSecurity-for-Exchange-Error: 0 X-G-Data-MailSecurity-for-Exchange-Sender: 23 X-G-Data-MailSecurity-for-Exchange-Server: d65e63f7-5c15-413f-8f63-c0d707471c93 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 X-G-Data-MailSecurity-for-Exchange-Guid: F54B69C4-CE61-4812-B822-90CCA5292B0B Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:24:44PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote: > In some environments it is common that many hosts share the same lower half > of their IPv6 addresses (in particular ::1). As __xfrm6_addr_hash() and > __xfrm6_daddr_saddr_hash() calculate the hash only from the lower halves, > as much as 1/3 of the hosts ends up in one hashtable chain which harms the > performance. > > Use complete IPv6 addresses when calculating the hashes. Rather than just > adding two more words to the xor, use jhash2() for consistency with > __xfrm6_pref_hash() and __xfrm6_dpref_spref_hash(). > > Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek Applied to ipsec-next, thanks a lot!