Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From:   Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@ziswiler.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ARM: dts: tegra: last minute fixes
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:10:51 +0200
Lines:  22
Message-ID: <1539691851.6233.14.camel@ziswiler.com>
References: <20181016104730.4598-1-marcel@ziswiler.com>
         <20181016115852.GE7449@sirena.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <20181016115852.GE7449@sirena.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 12:58 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> 
> > Marcel Ziswiler (9):
> >   ARM: tegra: fix simple-panel compatibles
> >   ARM: tegra: apalis-tk1/colibri_t20/t30: eval/iris: fix regulator
> > gpio
> >     enable
> >   ARM: tegra: colibri_t20: reorder pmic properties
> >   ARM: tegra: apalis-tk1: further regulator clean-up
> >   ARM: tegra: apalis_t30/tk1: annotate power I2C being on-module
> >   ARM: tegra: colibri_t30: further regulator clean-up
> >   ARM: tegra: apalis_t30: further regulator clean-up
> >   ASoC: tegra_sgtl5000: fix device_node refcounting
> >   ASoC: tegra_sgtl5000: fix platform name vs. of_node assignement
> 
> These ASoC patches appear to have absolutely no relationship with the
> rest of the series.  Is that the case or is there some dependency I'm
> missing?

Not outside of all being Tegra specific stuff, no. If you prefer I may
send them as a separate series.