Received: by 2002:ac0:a582:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m2-v6csp683527imm; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:47:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63/v3fy98m+mp9aQzipvpJzMIApq8lV+/t9IGHLn0UDeInTBa2h7qHhy8TiO8ha3UPJA/H9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7b83:: with SMTP id w3-v6mr26144902pll.285.1539784045297; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:47:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1539784045; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eSrRQYfbAwwgSiM/2DDOcMKAq9vEEs1GlixysfvjKKHLSTXZI2E0rlR6T7jQobH/df cDv7cIs6IlKCIwQcEMcav14fKV2HnYz2rqBNXLjYG+MzBEWZ8FUm1baRruVkWqGNIrov 8+iRgpl+qlauq5gayxWB2dClY7qBpDUxHHkK/xTeeMbzrfyPtUj+8Cd9u72Gy+KMQK5g LQwHQyvqFEdLchsiW6OWILaqzToCqdE5FC7m3YErVeNjOQmutzXAQgSuzOk2pwFguzlr sP/YW8ve2VlbqXJvTBzWIh3UfWmTlpc9FwUOXPpPUt8zetAynFQtqeBk87X57VzwNOnN cloA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=kM34RWHdo1dsxzgEGyEIx7zoQmZu0P/fdfEc0PS3/FU=; b=qo8g9gXcQpJO75rcNTXOXmA3fpm6yTiHFE083tSDI4wA3DfSAvs3RflY+gtbPnzOP6 1tEiJwuipVDAAejw/m4Z8uukf/tDZMyS7vDxkKPz8OqkNFB+NRNevFlhOVPgqEbqi+L9 y+NB0EGNTeEorUMk42nhAXUBHogu9S6GzNVYA9HdfMQC/6WXx2WaKd8P5SSQWT4hQjjF ONep1TOo6DzdPPxxHxdI3KpW3TqDM6x/UEJ3SXgIzRkoI2S5A0ka2I4jTsqRFmZFfqpA BBBzm+igtpQXQA+W6aKzZZNDfrCakzbA3zRpWwd1mHDzEinGBWPrIvKI9eGX0eRCThn6 rZsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XkMC+9QY; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n11-v6si16963890plk.333.2018.10.17.06.47.08; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XkMC+9QY; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727211AbeJQVlM (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:41:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:42563 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727050AbeJQVlL (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:41:11 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id i4-v6so12555419pgq.9 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:45:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kM34RWHdo1dsxzgEGyEIx7zoQmZu0P/fdfEc0PS3/FU=; b=XkMC+9QYXQepp3CJ28tZJibsHmvsYgUztJoFjBzYfkAtmOIX4H4Ry/QXnP+ujz5Qzc RbigJqhOOokCVxz/J8D1vc3R+evzQETyXh5cQPhThrfjWc7zjkOJsVONxEbPjzF8ZRT5 ksQvjwRDJRHAOBckW08gu1xGU4M/xa4CJJLEjQPUsUqJ2c9nSdLaGB1OVzfvZu3NO5c6 d8yHWEpt63IAN2A4K1FHax3ISDDQnfgX3WmhpV9UnaUAFeCw5kOR1r2l8rDtE/f3snK3 1hI5kffV9OiWdBMHq4E8JYBCJf5nZs+wxWtWy8huYiA9IRI1uvdVluakPP9TRPZW2d9R zxKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kM34RWHdo1dsxzgEGyEIx7zoQmZu0P/fdfEc0PS3/FU=; b=GAIvC/0YKohytYWFAPaVSvv2nsJtaEI+Ik/ojpIRluii4/XRc2QjyFqKIvZie2n19o ZKqtj2q9QdGYjGUtIiBl3T4VQQ0XvPKX75shrczvcJjCe6wpeuuu89cUIRFEPy0N1RkU Ad+xxkLAcn6LRdR/lNYZnAnEbgh3mEbHLHwjnfFnGprmypetl6hjZu8yLYAe8iAV5Xuk +ai7FbhXxPUGtmeaninqytGVLaNlYF2TEXN3PiKmDNo4DZHXTmVFpAjATQWBzxIPc+vJ 2gRFQAC+iluAjSV1pfl7wPTDgZv/5IWBTIzOP/Xf8FhUfULaQuBU+1mOiwS3jB5AZd8g ZbCA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojEFBpN5wMGxnTYSxGnfdNoSoVJGDa4ix837FEC1zvxf0Gcc6s4 6IvMCm0AqAHmCEOUZ/a/Dy3PJ8g3 X-Received: by 2002:a63:a902:: with SMTP id u2-v6mr24605535pge.207.1539783924774; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net (108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.223.40.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q24-v6sm20429977pff.83.2018.10.17.06.45.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] code-of-conduct: Remove explicit list of discrimination factors To: Josh Triplett , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Tomi Valkeinen References: <20181017071902.30102-1-geert@linux-m68k.org> <20181017091325.GA15991@localhost> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:45:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181017091325.GA15991@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/2018 02:13 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:19:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false >> impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be >> allowed. > > This impression is, in fact, false, as has already been discussed > elsewhere. I had hoped that discussion would suffice. > > As mentioned there: The original commit explicitly said "Explicit > guidelines have demonstrated success in other projects and other areas > of the kernel."; this is precisely the kind of explicit guideline it > refers to. Listing explicit cases to cover does not imply other cases > are not covered; it does, however, ensure that the listed cases *are*, > and helps people know that they're covered. > That is really a matter of opinion. Mathematically speaking, your statement is incorrect. One may wonder why the list is made explicit without hint that it is an example. For example, political or social views are _not_ listed. Wasn't the same CoC used in other projects to at least try to punish individuals with specific political and/or social opinions, just for having those opinions and expressing them outside the scope of the project ? > This patch is not OK, and defeats one of the purposes of the original > change. The CoC, as it stands, singles out maintainers for enforcement action. Based on your statement, is it correct to assume that this was on purpose ? If not, what is the explicit list of purposes of the original change ? Guenter