Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 10:23:54 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Cc:     Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Update SERDES_MAX to be SERDES_MAX
 + 1
Message-ID: <20181017152354.GA9268@bogus>
References: <cover.1539036280.git.gustavo@embeddedor.com>
 <3a1a95a4832af33dcd1842b0298d257bbcf1f5ab.1539036280.git.gustavo@embeddedor.com>
 <20181009072723.mshyvplpo2xmkyfl@qschulz>
 <dab86dfb-d56b-b7c3-8e2a-6955803a2842@embeddedor.com>
 <20181017150931.GA385@bogus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181017150931.GA385@bogus>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:09:31AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:44:52AM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 10/9/18 9:27 AM, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > > Hi Gustavo,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:21:36AM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > >> SERDES_MAX is a valid value to index ctrl->phys in
> > >> drivers/phy/mscc/phy-ocelot-serdes.c. But, currently,
> > >> there is an out-of-bounds bug in the mentioned driver
> > >> when reading from ctrl->phys, because the size of
> > >> array ctrl->phys is SERDES_MAX.
> > >>
> > >> Partially fix this by updating SERDES_MAX to be SERDES6G_MAX + 1.
> > >>
> > >> Notice that this is the first part of the solution to
> > >> the out-of-bounds bug mentioned above. Although this
> > >> change is not dependent on any other one.
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
> > > 
> > 
> > Friendly ping. Who can you take this?
> 
> Applied. No need (nor benefit) to ping me. You can check the status of 
> DT patches on patchwork[1]. If it is there and in the "New" state, it is 
> in my queue.

Actually, this doesn't apply to my tree as the file doesn't exist. It 
needs to go thru the phy tree. You didn't Cc the maintainer nor list, so 
resend.

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Rob