Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:22:34 -0700
From:   Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, tomi.valkeinen@iki.fi
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] code-of-conduct: Remove explicit list
 of discrimination factors
Message-ID: <20181017152234.GB17531@localhost>
References: <20181017071902.30102-1-geert@linux-m68k.org>
 <20181017091325.GA15991@localhost>
 <CAMuHMdX0G767xYYcd8TDMLBp3cY9+fz_aJFAuz8OxgmCmhbNrg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1a51fc4c-882c-59ef-7497-262e595af10e@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1a51fc4c-882c-59ef-7497-262e595af10e@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 06:32:36AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> One could consider adding something like "discrimination factors such as",
> or maybe "or any other discrimination factors not listed here" to the
> original text. Or a simple "regardless of, for example, ...".

These sound like perfectly reasonable ways to address this. Please
consider submitting a patch upstream based on this reasoning.