Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@yahoo.com>,
       DRI Devel <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1072965029.1603.261.camel@thor.asgaard.local>
References: <20031231182148.26486.qmail@web14918.mail.yahoo.com>
	 <1072958618.1603.236.camel@thor.asgaard.local>
	 <20040101133301.GB3242@holomorphy.com>
	 <1072965029.1603.261.camel@thor.asgaard.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Message-Id: <1072979706.28413.1.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 17:55:07 +0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 786
Lines: 19

On Iau, 2004-01-01 at 13:50, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Okay, you did something weird with nopage args, but I thought I did
> > the equivalent of this in the original patch?
> 
> This is about the canonical DRM code in the DRI tree.

99.9% of people run the DRM code in the kernel tree, so definitions of 
canonical might vary. I don't personally see a problem with the ifdefs.
The DRI devel tree has to work with anything, the kernel gets the luxury
of being able to strip out the defines that aren't needed for that
specific release.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/