Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 22:50:50 +0300
From:   Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
To:     Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc:     Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug report: MIPS CI20/jz4740-mmc DMA and PREEMPT_NONE
Message-ID: <20181017195050.GA20347@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
References: <20181014170431.GK3461@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
 <CA+7wUszkduiKMVx5Et3Q2-2tz72CXUKE1_kndC6V1d45uEY2Aw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+7wUszkduiKMVx5Et3Q2-2tz72CXUKE1_kndC6V1d45uEY2Aw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:38:07PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Since CONFIG_PREEMPT has been 'y' since at least commit 0752f92934292
> could you confirm that the original mmc driver (kernel from imgtech
> people) did work ok with PREEMPT_NONE (sorry I did not do my homework)
> ?

Sorry, cannot confirm or test that. I have only used the mainline kernel
on this board, since v4.5 or so with my own custom config which has
been PREEMPT_NONE until now.

A.