Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
User-Agent: alot/0.7
To:     Craig <ctatlor97@gmail.com>,
        Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>, andy.gross@linaro.org,
        david.brown@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
        linux@armlinux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        mturquette@baylibre.com, niklas.cassel@linaro.org,
        rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
        sudeep.holla@arm.com, thierry.escande@linaro.org,
        viresh.kumar@linaro.org
References: <1534248753-2440-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org>
 <2ae96741-94c0-ba4c-fc19-05d33179683c@codeaurora.org>
 <d682580d-5070-0271-197f-29d988172937@codeaurora.org>
 <D8FC68C0-2572-4A86-81D9-D0099D314A45@gmail.com>
 <F5A89365-C613-4FE2-AD32-DC0AC6DF380B@gmail.com>
 <fb81b8d5-3d24-b413-8d59-33cb70e46f8b@codeaurora.org>
 <153979105280.5275.841088095583550635@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <153979105280.5275.841088095583550635@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Message-ID: <153980741313.5275.10376918222904341760@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:16:53 -0700
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12)
> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31)
> > =

> > =

> > On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote:
> > > Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the q=
uick test I did.
> > >
> >       Thanks !!. Can i take that as =

> >           Tested-by: Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@gmail.com>  ?
> > =

> =

> Is this patch series going to be resent?
> =


Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're
good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the
registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would
appreciate it.