Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:37:15 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        gregkh <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, c-sky_gcc_upstream@c-sky.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 08/21] csky: Process management and Signal
Message-ID: <20181018023713.GC12027@guoren-Inspiron-7460>
References: <cover.1539655731.git.ren_guo@c-sky.com>
 <9ae1d1609a49d976ae7659157507018b0c846423.1539655732.git.ren_guo@c-sky.com>
 <CAK8P3a31sVAMCPXLqyqMpvj-gsxOmuf2qL0bT5crDQo0Wcg__g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a31sVAMCPXLqyqMpvj-gsxOmuf2qL0bT5crDQo0Wcg__g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:01 AM Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds files related to task_switch, sigcontext, signal,
> > fpu context switch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> >  - abiv2/fpu.c: Userspace should never be sent NSIGXXX as a si_code.
> >    Use FPE_FLTUNK instead.
> >  - abiv2/fpu.c: Use force_sig_fault instead.
> 
> I'm hesitant to provide a Reviewed-by: tag for this one, as I don't
> understand the signal handling enough myself, and it's something
> that should be reviewed properly because of the ABI implications.
> 
> Maybe someone else can have a closer look at this?
NSIGXXX and force_sig_fault modification is from Eric W. Biederman
in PATCH V6 and I forget add:
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Best Regards
 Guo Ren