Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/cpufreq: Reorganize the cpufreq files
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
        Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
        ionela.voinescu@arm.com,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
References: <CAJZ5v0iALqLw+Y_tKw86dh2oxnmvALhoVJxEcWWA+x1jU3GjdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1539855372-11472-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
 <CAJZ5v0ikpPk12PshjB7EwtGSz6kF5WJyKgDHB8cnXaEusy38UQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8585bac0-c72c-edf4-2e93-c8740a3b1b6c@linaro.org>
 <CAJZ5v0ia6jc80=xTkOSZofhmx80UXn2Kv-mPJ6B4JZ-Sc75kBA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <a662abc2-a44a-de58-3fec-76f477e3bfd2@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:13:42 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0ia6jc80=xTkOSZofhmx80UXn2Kv-mPJ6B4JZ-Sc75kBA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 18/10/2018 12:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:54 AM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/10/2018 11:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:36 AM Daniel Lezcano
>>> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It was suggested to set the scene for the PM components in the
>>>> scheduler code organization in the recent discussion about making the
>>>> scheduler aware of the capacity capping from the thermal framework.
>>>>
>>>> Move the cpufreq files into its own directory as suggested at:
>>>>
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/353
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/408
>>>
>>> Fair enough, but do we need to do that right now?
>>
>> I'm not planning to do more code reorg than this patch right now. Up to
>> you to decide if you are willing to take them.
> 
> The SPDX one certainly is applicable, but I'm not sure about the other one TBH.
> 
> Why don't you add the SPDX IDs to those files as they are for now?

Yes, sure.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog