Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181017000809.GA21292@WindFlash> <20181017081115.GA22535@zn.tnic>
 <CAK7LNASVn7CB5uL9tCtNC2u4Ary5eb-vyiB_sS2ey5AZNweKAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181017083126.GB22535@zn.tnic> <CADvQ+rFa=XEuxLb=yPmtJE2QepBNjCVzjEY5urVzCaSF1tJBYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181018091606.GA20831@zn.tnic> <CAK7LNAQq7aE_2QYwqei7M9fg8Yen7-ucjz-t2E_hq2xkznKsQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181018165057.GH20831@zn.tnic> <CAK7LNAQhbn-qZg_Bywk8rf0+oZhVbDjJ=PtcKGCL+k4Fp-ijSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQhbn-qZg_Bywk8rf0+oZhVbDjJ=PtcKGCL+k4Fp-ijSw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 23:50:57 -0300
Message-ID: <CADvQ+rHRaoAME=tJBzkTg74K237SNm2hFN8mxFemDwa3CKQibA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Adds -Wshadow=local on KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, lkcamp@lists.libreplanetbr.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy6545@gmail.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:42 PM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> Adding -Wshadow to KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS emits another warning in Kconfig.
> Of course, it is easy to fix.
For v2, I already replaced '-Wshadow=local' for '-Wshadow' and fixed this
warning.

> But, I just started to think this option is a kind of harsh...

The v2 it's almost done. You think it will be useful, or should I drop it?

Regards,
Leonardo Bras