Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:08:53 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc:     Leonardo =?utf-8?B?QnLDoXM=?= <leobras.c@gmail.com>,
        lkcamp@lists.libreplanetbr.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy6545@gmail.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Adds -Wshadow=local on KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS
Message-ID: <20181019080853.GA28610@zn.tnic>
References: <20181017000809.GA21292@WindFlash>
 <20181017081115.GA22535@zn.tnic>
 <CAK7LNASVn7CB5uL9tCtNC2u4Ary5eb-vyiB_sS2ey5AZNweKAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181017083126.GB22535@zn.tnic>
 <CADvQ+rFa=XEuxLb=yPmtJE2QepBNjCVzjEY5urVzCaSF1tJBYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181018091606.GA20831@zn.tnic>
 <CAK7LNAQq7aE_2QYwqei7M9fg8Yen7-ucjz-t2E_hq2xkznKsQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181018165057.GH20831@zn.tnic>
 <CAK7LNAQhbn-qZg_Bywk8rf0+oZhVbDjJ=PtcKGCL+k4Fp-ijSw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQhbn-qZg_Bywk8rf0+oZhVbDjJ=PtcKGCL+k4Fp-ijSw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:41:31AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Adding -Wshadow to KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS emits another warning in Kconfig.
> Of course, it is easy to fix.
> But, I just started to think this option is a kind of harsh...

What is more, if we added -Wshadow to KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS, then there'll
be a difference in build options between host and target kernel in that
the host kernel build will be stricter wrt shadowing. Thus, it is a
maintainer decision, IMHO.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.