Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265516AbUABLsr (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 06:48:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265520AbUABLsr (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 06:48:47 -0500 Received: from gizmo09bw.bigpond.com ([144.140.70.19]:27815 "HELO gizmo09bw.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265516AbUABLsp (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 06:48:45 -0500 Mail-Copies-To: never To: Linux Kernel List Cc: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Greg KH Subject: udev - please help me to understand Keywords: udev,numbers,device,worry,point,minor,major,devfs From: Steve Youngs X-Face: #/1'_-|5_1$xjR,mVKhpfMJcRh8"k}_a{EkIO:Ox<]@zl/Yr|H,qH#3jJi6Aw(Mg@"!+Z"C N_S3!3jzW^FnPeumv4l#,E}J.+e%0q(U>#b-#`~>l^A!_j5AEgpU)>t+VYZ$:El7hLa1:%%L=3%B>n K{^jU_{& Organization: Linux Users - Fanatics Dept. X-URL: X-Request-PGP: X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 1659 2093 19D5 C06E D320 3A20 1D27 DB4B A94B 3003 X-Attribution: SY Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel List , linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sf.net, Greg KH Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 21:48:36 +1000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1004 (Gnus v5.10.4) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2253 Lines: 62 --=-=-= Hi Greg! I've been looking at this "udev" thingy and I can't for the life of me see why I'd need it. There doesn't appear to be _any_ advantages of using udev in my present situation. No, I don't use devfs. I have zero hot-pluggable devices (that might change somewhere in the distant future, but for now I don't have any). And never in my wildest dreams could I ever imagine running out of device numbers. Reading through the documentation that I've found about udev, your main points seem to be about: - udev vs devfs - running out of device major/minor numbers - not having to worry about major/minor numbers For me, the first point is moot because I don't use devfs. The second point is just plain ridiculous, there is just _no_ way that it could happen (remember that I'm talking about my own situation). As for the third point, well, I don't worry about device numbers now. In the years that I've been using Linux (since 2.0.something) you could probably count the number of times I've had to worry about major/minor numbers on the fingers of one hand. The _only_ times have been on those incredibly rare occasions when I've needed to create a new device file in /dev/. So, Greg, is there _any_ reason why I'd want to be using udev? I have other questions, but they can wait until I know whether or not I need the thing in the first place. Thank you very much for your time and patience. -- |---------------------| | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. | | The proof of the pudding, is under the crust. | |---------------------------------| --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Eicq - The XEmacs ICQ Client iEYEABECAAYFAj/1WpgACgkQHSfbS6lLMAM8rQCgxDc0X84iGQ3UKaTLoQONMe+v QHkAn2FdLKksTxHNpSw2i2KUFic6fxHC =aP9a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/