Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:35:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:35:12 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:45585 "HELO postfix.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:35:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:48:30 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel To: Jonathan Morton Cc: Horst von Brand , Mike Galbraith , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Jonathan Morton wrote: > I have, however, found a bug in the non-overcommit patch - it seems to > be capable of double-freeing (and then some) - starting 4 Java VMs and > then closing them causes VMReserved to go negative on my system. *grin* It's nice to see the non-overcommit code being tested and fixed like this. If there turns out to be a demand for this patch, I guess we'll even want to integrate this into the kernel ... possibly even the 2.4 kernel, if the code changes are small/managable enough. regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/