Received: by 2002:ac0:aa62:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w31-v6csp1643435ima; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:10:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV622LuqZE9NdqOsn+YtTx/5mfYxbn53bf7r/WvkcEXYu0M/bo0fTP+oZw/Gon+XqDscEbP0o X-Received: by 2002:a63:40c2:: with SMTP id n185-v6mr41398852pga.116.1540167057747; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:10:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540167057; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uWHjMnvaPXEMtK6h4jch+eTFYoX9se/D94B4XoLiveHDwg/lHrvZqenCgWHpx2F2mj tpXpC50R/rdaQS1pph0uZozlY3ne3fQDw7kKjFtDpkVdAZpBfpeR+fqSfcbY6mWLe30x 6oJKvfRWSguhD8y8kEM4W284YJtl8WCQ+SHm3XJXJzaPJveCOiL6o08JPCvDyPOTgTpf 3oA55nY1fHzFRLOLUghSeBu39dm++J+4BYeETVQfxbWPdGKpD/7ZMb7nDf8Gucvroy46 cuc1GevR4R2mGkf8ROMY7vursLi6OeR8CD/3AGNJcc70NOCa2pgp2cOZVTnxNqmaPhBs S5lg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=wp5satsElHl0tHBZdQXJotNrpFJ5/lFrCqfCdYrtzwA=; b=GF20I02Dq+CDHH33xTnX4fj8Nu6k5n5zTBVSmNqqCvbKy/1dI0LcuyBKEw5nVafyPH RY5uIjlVFJ0PU+teOnk2FkgXLtDs6L/yxLKhJDxNL+SncTuastGKxUZixTj1sdX80an9 R9FweuvREQNQGuDEm7uOwtC+3zTs8IsMtCwQp2LPg+1llaOQvYCDWux/U68y+z+209/G E3nfIVEln5SXK8Ii/6K5Vg8m9jFybqfLLnNgA4wvJjyXF/gkpFWgH5vek+9C75kE2NNX U6zH6/p0sfzDSi8EPwqmyVWaGs92zDddnUM3mTyLKk3HFlnsDDhYWCP3Aw8N0MJDIfu+ ZC4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e73-v6si32104791pfb.98.2018.10.21.17.10.12; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727979AbeJVIZW (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Oct 2018 04:25:22 -0400 Received: from server.atrad.com.au ([150.101.241.2]:46106 "EHLO server.atrad.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726813AbeJVIZW (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2018 04:25:22 -0400 Received: from marvin.atrad.com.au (IDENT:1008@marvin.atrad.com.au [192.168.0.2]) by server.atrad.com.au (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id w9M01WTl010222 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:31:34 +1030 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:31:32 +1030 From: Jonathan Woithe To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: r8169 regression: UDP packets dropped intermittantly Message-ID: <20181022000132.GD27585@marvin.atrad.com.au> References: <20171218054951.GJ17747@marvin.atrad.com.au> <20171218223224.GA13172@marvin.atrad.com.au> <20171219054532.GA13685@marvin.atrad.com.au> <20171219122523.lhavmoxo3ippftyn@unicorn.suse.cz> <20171220052011.GN8641@marvin.atrad.com.au> <20180115065658.GI16419@marvin.atrad.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180115065658.GI16419@marvin.atrad.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-MIMEDefang-action: accept X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 192.168.0.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 05:26:59PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > Is there any more information that can be provided (or tests done) to assist > in tracking this problem down? Based on the tests done in December it seems > that the problem only affects specific RTL-8169 variants, with most being > ok. Is it a case that we simply need to accept that for the greater good > commit da78dbff2e05630921c551dbbc70a4b7981a8fff has permanently broken > Netgear GA311 [1] network cards with respect to these UDP packets and that > nothing can be done? For future reference, commit 6b839b6cf9eada30b086effb51e5d6076bafc761 ("r8169: fix NAPI handling under high load") appears to have fixed the regression documented by this thread. Thanks to Heiner Kallweit for the work which lead to this solution. Regards jonathan > [1] Or perhaps any using the RTL8110s variant.