Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 18:07:00 -0200 (BRST)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: Stan Bubrouski <stan@ccs.neu.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, khorben@defora.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Linux on Cyrix 6x86]
In-Reply-To: <1072812026.1760.19.camel@duergar>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0401021806090.20333@logos.cnet>
References: <3FF1C5BC.8010902@zytor.com> <1072812026.1760.19.camel@duergar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1300
Lines: 32


On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Stan Bubrouski wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 13:36, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > From: Pierre Pronchery <khorben@defora.org>
> > To: hpa@zytor.com
> > Subject: Linux on Cyrix 6x86
> > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:19:18 +0100
> >
> > 	Hi,
> >
> > I've just compiled Linux 2.4.23 for a Cyrix 6x86 P166+ processor, with
> > the appropriate "Processor family" option "586/K5/5x86/6x86/6x86MX"
> > (CONFIG_M586=y). It says it's for 586-compatible processors, possibly
> > lacking the TSC register, though the kernel panic'd at boot, saying it
> > needed a TSC register.
> >
>
> I have the same processor in my old archive machine with an ancient
> 2.0.36 kernel.  I do recall the kernel is an i586 and I believe there
> was a cyrix CPU option back then (I have to take the drives out of that
> machine and put them in this one to check as the system stopped booting
> a few days ago).  So looks like a bug.

Pierre informed me privately that he was doing something wrong --- he
managed to boot 2.4.23 with CONFIG_M586 on his Cyrix processor.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/